Calidad de la canal y la carne en pollos de ceba que consumen Roystonea regia: Calidad de canal y carne con Roystonea regia

dc.creatorMartínez-Pérez, Madeleidy
dc.creatorVives-Hernández, Yesenia
dc.creatorRodríguez-Sánchez, Bárbara
dc.creatorPérez-Acosta, Osney G.
dc.date2021-03-24
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-15T14:43:25Z
dc.date.available2022-12-15T14:43:25Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1984
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5353403
dc.descriptionObjective. To study meat and carcass quality in broilers that intake Roystonea regia (royal palm nut) fruits meals. Materials and methods. A total of 40 broilers distributed according to a completely randomized design were used in four treatments: control (corn-soybean paste) and the inclusion of 5, 10 and 15% royal palm nut meal. The carcass yield, abdominal fat and meat quality (technological and fatty acid composition (FA)) were studied. For the appearance parameters, a non-parametric analysis of simple classification was performed. Results. There were no differences between treatments for carcass weight and pH at 45 minutes and 24 hours postmortem. There was a reduction in abdominal fat by 5 and 15% compared to the control (13.00 and 11.96 vs. 17.02 g / kg), while 10% did not differ from the rest (15.10 g/kg) (P<0.01). There were no differences in color, except for the luminosity in the drumstick that was superior with the inclusion of 10 and 15% (48.62 and 49.22) with respect to 5% (45.32) and the control did not differ between treatments (47.53) (P<0.05). The composition of FA in the different edible portions showed that the broilers deposited oleic, linoleic and palmitic acids in higher proportion. Conclusions. The inclusion of royal palm nut meal in broiler diets does not change the carcass yield, reduces abdominal fat and positively affects meat quality indicators.en-US
dc.descriptionObjetivo. Estudiar la calidad de la canal y la carne en pollos de ceba que consumen harina de frutos de Roystonea regia (palmiche). Materiales y métodos. Se utilizaron 40 pollos de ceba distribuidos según diseño completamente aleatorizado en cuatro tratamientos: control (maíz-pasta de soya) y la inclusión de 5, 10 y 15% de harina de palmiche. Se estudió el rendimiento de la canal, grasa abdominal y la calidad de la carne (tecnológicos y composición de ácidos grasos (AG)). Para los parámetros de apariencia se realizó análisis de varianza no paramétrico de clasificación simple. Resultados. No se encontraron diferencias entre tratamientos para el peso de la canal y pH a los 45 minutos y 24 horas postmortem. Hubo una reducción de la grasa abdominal en el 5 y 15% con respecto al control (13.00 y 11.96 vs 17.02 g/kg), en tanto que el 10% no difirió del resto (15.10 g/kg) (P<0,01). No se observaron diferencias en el color, excepto para la luminosidad en el muslo que fue superior con la inclusión de 10 y 15% (48.62 y 49.22) respecto al 5% (45.32) y el control no difirió entre tratamientos (47.53) (P<0,05). La composición de AG en las diferentes porciones comestibles mostró que las aves depositaron los ácidos oleico, linoleico y palmítico en mayor proporción. Conclusiones. La inclusión de  harina de palmiche a las dietas de pollos de ceba no modifica el rendimiento de la canal, reduce la grasa abdominal e incide positivamente en los indicadores de calidad de la carne.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formatapplication/xml
dc.formatapplication/xml
dc.formataudio/mpeg
dc.formataudio/mpeg
dc.languagespa
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdobaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1984/2990
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1984/2991
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1984/3312
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1984/3314
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1984/3313
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1984/3315
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1984/2992
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1984/2993
dc.relation/*ref*/1. Akbar Mir N, Rafiq A, Kumar F, Singh V, Shukla V. Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2017; 54(10):2997–3009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2789-z
dc.relation/*ref*/2. Oliva D, Martínez M, Jiménez L, Ly J. Performance traits of growing pigs fed on diets of royal palm nut meal. Cuban J Agric Sci. 2018; 52(2):1-8. http://www.cjascience.com/index.php/CJAS/article/view/793
dc.relation/*ref*/3. Rodríguez E, Vicent R, González V, Adames Y, Tirado S, Lightbourne E. Obtención de aceite del fruto completo de Roystonea regia con diferentes disolventes. Rev Cub Química. 2011; 23(3):34-38. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4435/443543724004.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/4. Marrero D, Morales C L, Rodríguez E A, González V. Determination of sterol and fatty alcohols in unsaponifiable matter of Roystonea regia fruits oil. J Med Plant Res. 2013; 7(37):2736-2740. https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380721933_Delange%20et%20al.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/5. Wideman N, O’Bryan CA, Crandall PG. Factors affecting poultry meat colour and consumer preferences. A review. World Poultry Sci J. 2016; 72(2):353-366. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933916000015
dc.relation/*ref*/6. NRC (National Research Council). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. Ninth revised edition. Washington D.C: Editorial National Academic Press; 1994.
dc.relation/*ref*/7. Duncan DB. Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests. Biometrics. 1955; 11(1):1–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
dc.relation/*ref*/8. Conover WJ. Some tests based on the binomial distribution. Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc: New York, NY; 1999.
dc.relation/*ref*/9. Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW. InfoStat. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. 2012. URL http://www.infostat.com.ar
dc.relation/*ref*/10. Santos M, Lon-Wo E, Savón L, Herrera M. Inclusion of Morus alba leaf meal: its effect on apparent retention of nutrient, productive performance and quality of the carcass of naked neck fowls. Cuban J Agric Sci. 2014; 48(3):265-269. http://www.cjascience.com/index.php/CJAS/article/view/581
dc.relation/*ref*/11. Ashayerizadeh A, Dastar B, Shams Shargh M, Sadeghi Mahoonak A, Zerehdaran S. Effects of feeding fermented rapeseed meal on growth performance, gastrointestinal microflora population, blood metabolites, meat quality, and lipid metabolism in broiler chickens. Livestock Science. 2018; 216:183-190. https://doi.org/10.106/j.livsci.2018.08.012
dc.relation/*ref*/12. Caro Y, Bustamante D, Arias R, Batista R, Pérez N, Contino Y, Almaguel R, Castro M, Ly J. Estudios de la composición química de palmiches cubanos destinados a alimentar ganado porcino y cunícula. Revista Computadorizada de Producción Porcina (RCPP). 2015; 22(2):79-81. http://www.iip.co.cu/RCPP/222/222_03YCaro.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/13. Arias R, Reyes JL, Bustamante D, Jiménez L, Caro Y, Ly J. Caracterización química e índices químico-físicos de palmiches artemiseños para cerdos. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2016; 28(3). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/3/aria28036.html
dc.relation/*ref*/14. Petracci M, Mudalal S, Soglia F, Cavani C. Meat quality in fast-growing broiler chickens. World Poultry Sci J. 2015. 71(2):363-374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933915000367
dc.relation/*ref*/15. Attia YA, Al-Harthi MA, Korish MA, Shiboob MM. Evaluación de la calidad de la carne de pollo en el mercado minorista: efectos del tipo y origen de las canales. Rev Mex Cienc. Pecu. 2016; 7(3):321-339. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v7i3.4213
dc.relation/*ref*/16. Velasco V, Soto VH, Williams P, Campos J, Astudillo R, Rodríguez H. Meat quality parameters of broiler chickens fed diets containing chicory (Cichorium intybus) vinasse. Chilean J. Agric. Anim. Sci., ex Agro-Ciencia 2018; 34(1):26-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/SO719-38902018005000203
dc.relation/*ref*/17. Rajkumar U, Muthukumar M, Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Raju MVLN, Rama Rao SV, Chatterjee RN. Comparative evaluation of carcass traits and meat quality in native Aseel chickens and commercial broilers. Br Poult Sci. 2016; 57(3):339-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1162282
dc.relation/*ref*/18. Džinić N, Puvača N, Tasić T, Ikonić P, Okanović Đ. How meat quality and sensory perception is influenced by feeding poultry plant extracts. World Poultry Sci J. 2015; 71(4):673-681. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933915002378
dc.relation/*ref*/19. Lara LJC, Baião NC, Aguilar CAL, Cançado SV, Fiuza MA, Ribeiro BRC. Rendimento, composição e teor de ácidos graxos da carcaça de frangos de corte alimentados com diferentes fontes lipídicas. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2006; 58(1):108-115. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352006000100016
dc.relation/*ref*/20. Khalifa AH, Omar MB, Hussein SM, Abdel-mbdy HE. Nutritional Value of Farmed and Wild Quail Meats. Assiut. J Agric Sci. 2016; 47(6-1):58-71. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajas.2016.2574
dc.relation/*ref*/21. Ajantha A, Senthilkumar S, Sakthivael PC, Purushothaman MR. Nutritional influence on quality of egg and meat in poultry. A Review Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 6(6):3338–3345. http://ijset.net/journal/1968.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/22. Avazkhanloo M, Shahir MH, Khalaji S, JafariAnarkooli I. Flaxseed extrusion and expansion coupled with enzyme and pelleting changed protein and lipid molecular structure of flaxseed and improved digestive enzymes activity, intestinal morphology, breast muscle fatty acids and performance of broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020; 260:Article114341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114341
dc.relation/*ref*/23. Toomer OT, Livingston M, Wall B, Sanders E, Vu T, Malheiros, RD, et al. Feeding high-oleic peanuts to meat-type broiler chickens enhances the fatty acid profile of the meat produced. Poult Sci J. 2020; 99(4): 2236-2245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.015
dc.relation/*ref*/24. Kumari S, Meng GY, Ebrahimi M. Conjugated linoleic acid as functional food in poultry products: A review. Int J Food Prop. 2017; 20(3):491-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2016.1168835
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2021 Madeleidy Martínez Pérezes-ES
dc.sourceJournal MVZ Cordoba; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2021): Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 26(2) Mayo-Agosto 2021; e1984en-US
dc.sourceRevista MVZ Córdoba; Vol. 26 Núm. 2 (2021): Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 26(2) Mayo-Agosto 2021; e1984es-ES
dc.source1909-0544
dc.source0122-0268
dc.source10.21897/rmvz.v26.n2.2021
dc.subjectPoultryen-US
dc.subjectfatty acidsen-US
dc.subjectmeatsen-US
dc.subjectpalmen-US
dc.subjectAveses-ES
dc.subjectácidos grasoses-ES
dc.subjectcarneses-ES
dc.subjectpalmaes-ES
dc.titleMeat and carcass quality in broilers that intake Roystonea regia: Carcass and meat quality with Roystonea regiaen-US
dc.titleCalidad de la canal y la carne en pollos de ceba que consumen Roystonea regia: Calidad de canal y carne con Roystonea regiaes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución