Systematization of the prevalence of Anaplasma spp. in canines and meta-analysis of A. platys and A. phagocytophilum

Sistematización de la prevalencia de Anaplasma spp., en caninos y metanálisis de A. platys y A. phagocytophilum

dc.creatorCardona Arias, Jaiberth Antonio
dc.creatorZapata Marín, Juliana
dc.creatorUrán Velásquez, Johanna Marcela
dc.date2019-05-25
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-15T14:42:54Z
dc.date.available2022-12-15T14:42:54Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1310
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5353275
dc.descriptionObjective. To estimate the general prevalence of Anaplasma spp. and specific prevalence of A. platys and A. phagocytophilum in canines, through studies published between 2000 and 2018. Material and methods. Systematic review with 14 search strategies, guaranteeing completeness and reproducibility according PRISMA. Quality was evaluated with STROBE. The global prevalence and the specific ones were estimated according to country, period and diagnostic test, with their confidence intervals of 95%. Forest Plot was performed for the individual and global prevalence of A platys or A. phagocytophilum according to PCR, ELISA and IFI, which were compared based on Statistic Z. Results. Thirty studies were included with 18 472 canines, mostly from Brazil, United States and Germany. In IFI the prevalence was 39.0% (95% CI = 37.0-41.0), in ELISA 9.3% (95% CI = 8.8-9.8) and in CRP 7.1% (95% CI = 6.4-7.8). The prevalence based on CRP was statistically greater in America with 11.9% (95% CI = 10.5-13.3) compared to 5.5% in Africa (95% CI = 1.2-9.7), Asia 4.1% (95% CI = 3.1-5.1) and Europe 3.5% (95% CI = 2.5-4.5). The prevalence of A. platys with CRP was 16.1% (IC95% = 14.2-17.9) and of A. phagocytophilum 3.7% (95% CI = 2.8-4.6). Conclusions. A high prevalence of global infection was found, with greater importance of A. platys, in a low number of publications worldwide and with a high heterogeneity according to the country, the diagnostic technique and the species involved.en-US
dc.descriptionObjetivo. Estimar la prevalencia general de Anaplasma spp. y la prevalencia específica de A. platys y A. phagocytophilum en caninos, mediante estudios publicados entre 2000 y 2018. Materiales y métodos. Revisión sistemática con 14 estrategias de búsqueda, garantizando exhaustividad y reproducibilidad en fases de la guía PRISMA. Se evaluó la calidad con STROBE. Se calcularon frecuencias y se estimó la prevalencia global y las específicas según país, periodo y prueba diagnóstica, con sus intervalos de confianza del 95%. Se realizó Forest Plot para la prevalencia individual y global de A. platys o A. phagocytophilum según PCR, ELISA e IFI, las cuales se compararon con base en el Estadístico Z. Resultados. Se incluyeron 30 estudios con 18.472 caninos, la mayoría de Brasil, Estados Unidos y Alemania. En IFI se halló una prevalencia de 39.0% (IC95%= 37.0-41.0), en ELISA 9.3% (IC95%= 8.8-9.8) y en PCR 7.1% (IC95%= 6.4-7.8). La prevalencia basada en PCR fue estadísticamente mayor en América con 11.9% (IC95%=10.5-13.3) frente a África con 5.5% (IC95%=1.2-9.7), Asia 4.1% (IC95%=3.1-5.1) y Europa 3.5% (IC95%=2.5-4.5). La prevalencia de A. platys con PCR fue 16.1% (IC95%=14.2-17.9) y de A. phagocytophilum 3.7% (IC95%= 2.8-4.6). Conclusiones. Se halló una elevada prevalencia de infección, con mayor importancia de A. platys, en un bajo número de publicaciones en el ámbito mundial y con una elevada heterogeneidad según el país, la técnica diagnóstica y la especie implicada.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/xml
dc.formatapplication/xml
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.formatapplication/zip
dc.languagespa
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Córdobaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1310/1975
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1310/1976
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1310/2279
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1310/2280
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1310/2281
dc.relationhttps://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/1310/2282
dc.relation/*ref*/1. Carrade D, Foley J, Borjesson D, Sykes J. Canine granulocytic Anaplasmosis: a review. J Vet Intern Med. 2009; 23(6):1129-1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0384.x
dc.relation/*ref*/2. Dolz G, Ábrego L, Romero L, Campos L, Bouza L, Jiménez A. Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in Costa Rica. Acta Méd Costarric. 2013; 55(Suppl. 1): 34-40. https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-60022013000400008
dc.relation/*ref*/3. Pujalte G, Marberry S, Libertin C. Tick-Borne Illnesses in the United States. Prim Care. 2018; 45(3):379-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2018.05.011
dc.relation/*ref*/4. Soto K. Determinación de la prevalencia de anaplasmosis en el ganado bovino faenado en la empresa Metropolitana de Rastro de Quito mediante la aplicación de las técnicas de diagnóstico: microscopía de frotis sanguíneos, PCR y cELISA. Ecuador: Escuela Politécnica del Ejército, Ingeniería en Biotecnología; 2010. http://repositorio.espe.edu.ec/handle/21000/2846
dc.relation/*ref*/5. Mateus T, Castro A, Ribeiro J, Vieira M. Multiple Zoonotic Parasites Identified in Dog Feces Collected in Ponte de Lima, Portugal - A Potential Threat to Human Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(9):9050–9067. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110909050
dc.relation/*ref*/6. Troncoso I, Fisher C, Villarroel C, Herzberg D. Case report: Anaplasma phagocytophilum in a dog. Hospitales veterinarios. 2014, 6(2):41-46. http://www.rhv.cl/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=83&Itemid=
dc.relation/*ref*/7. Berzina I, Krudewig C, Silaghi C, Matise I, Ranka R, Müller N, et al. Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA amplified from lesional skin of seropositive dogs. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014; 5(3):329-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.12.010
dc.relation/*ref*/8. Stuen S, Granquist EG, Silaghi C. Anaplasma phagocytophilum a widespread multi-host pathogen with highly adaptive strategies. J Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013; 22:3-31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2013.00031
dc.relation/*ref*/9. Greene C, Enfermedades infecciosas del perro y el gato. 3ed. Buenos Aires: Argentina; 2008.
dc.relation/*ref*/10. Gaunt S, Beall M, Stillman B, Lorentzen L, Diniz P, Chandrashekar R, Breitschwerdt E. Experimental infection and co-infection of dogs with Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis: hematologic, serologic and molecular findings. Parasit Vectors. 2010; 3(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-3-33
dc.relation/*ref*/11. Vargas G, Rogerio M, Cendales D, Gonçalves L, Hoeppner M, et al. Molecular detection of Anaplasma species in dogs in Colombia. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2016; 25(4):459-464. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612016066
dc.relation/*ref*/12. Carelli G, Decaro N, Lorusso A , Elia G , Lorusso E , Mari V, et al. Detection and quantification of Anaplasma marginale DNA in blood samples of cattle by real-time PCR. Vet Microbiol. 2007; 124(1):107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.03.022
dc.relation/*ref*/13. Pérez R, Fernández P, Encinas A. Garrapatas y anaplasmosis granulocítica humana. Rev Ibérica Parasitología. 2006; 66(1):17-29. http://bibliotecavirtual.ranf.com/es/catalogo_imagenes/grupo.cmd?path=1001734
dc.relation/*ref*/14. Oteo J, Brouqui P. Ehrlichiosis and human anaplasmosis. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2005; 23(6):375-380. https://doi.org/10.1157/13076178
dc.relation/*ref*/15. González de Dios J. Revisión sistemática y metanálisis (I): conceptos básicos. Evid Pediatr. 2007; 3(4):107. https://evidenciasenpediatria.es/articulo/5204/revision-sistematica-y-metaanalisis-i-conceptos-basicos
dc.relation/*ref*/16. Huang H, Unver A, Perez M, Orellana N, Rikihisa Y. Prevalence and molecular analysis of Anaplasma platys in dogs in Lara, Venezuela. Braz J Microbiol. 2005; 36(3):211-216. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-83822005000300002
dc.relation/*ref*/17. Barutzki D, De Nicola A, Zeziola M, Reule M. Seroprevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in dogs in Germany. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2006; 119(7-8):342-347. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17009720
dc.relation/*ref*/18. Levi O, Waner T, Baneth G, Keysary A, Bruchim Y, Silverman J, Harrus S. Seroprevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum among healthy dogs and horses in Israel. J Vet Med. 2006; 53(2):78-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00911.x
dc.relation/*ref*/19. Solano L, Trotta M, Razia L, Furlanello T, Caldin M. Molecular survey of Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum from blood of dogs in Italy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1078:515-518. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1374.101
dc.relation/*ref*/20. Jensen J, Simon D, Escobar H, Soller J, Bullerdiek J, Beelitz P, et al. Anaplasma phagocytophilum in dogs in Germany, Alemania. Zoonoses Public Health. 2007; 54(2):94-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01028.x
dc.relation/*ref*/21. Beall M, Chandrashekar R, Eberts MD, Cyr KE, Diniz PP, Mainville C, et al. Serological and molecular prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Ehrlichia species in dogs from Minnesota. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008; 8(4):455-464. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2007.0236
dc.relation/*ref*/22. M’ghirbi Y, Ghorbel A, Amouri M, Nebaoui A, Haddad S, Bouattour A. Clinical, serological, and molecular evidence of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in dogs in Tunisia. Tunez. Parasitol Res. 2009; 104(4):767-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1253-4
dc.relation/*ref*/23. Pantchev N, Schaper R, Limousin S, Norden N, Weise M, Lorentzen L. Occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis and tick-borne infections caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis in domestic dogs in France: results of a countrywide serologic survey. Parasitol Res. 2009; 105 (Suppl. 1):101-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1501-2
dc.relation/*ref*/24. Barber R, Li Q, Diniz P, Porter B, Claiborne M, Levine J, et al. Evaluation of brain tissue or cerebrospinal fluid with broadly reactive polymerase chain reaction for Ehrlichia, Anaplasma, spotted fever group Rickettsia, Bartonella, and Borrelia species in canine neurological diseases (109 cases). J Vet Intern Med. 2010; (2):372-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0466.x
dc.relation/*ref*/25. Sakamoto L, Ichikawa Y, Sakata Y, Matsumoto K, Inokuma H. Detection of Anaplasma bovis DNA in the peripheral blood of domestic dogs in Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2010; 63(5):349-52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20859003
dc.relation/*ref*/26. Carrade D, Foley J, Sullivan M, Foley C, Sykes J. Spatial distribution of seroprevalence for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Washington, Oregon, and California. Vet Clin Pathol. 2011; 40(3):293-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-165x.2011.00334.x
dc.relation/*ref*/27. Kohn B, Silaghi C, Galke D, Arndt G, Pfister K. Infections with Anaplasma phagocytophilum in dogs in Germany. Res Vet Sci. 2011; 91(1):71-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.08.008
dc.relation/*ref*/28. Barth C, Straubinger R, Sauter-Louis C, Hartmann K. Prevalence of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum and their clinical relevance in dogs in Munich, Germany. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2012; (7-8):337-44. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22919928
dc.relation/*ref*/29. Cardoso L, Mendão C, Madeira de Carvalho L.Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia canis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma spp. and Leishmania infantum in apparently healthy and CVBD-suspect dogs in Portugal--a national serological study Portugal. Parasit Vectors. 2012; 5(62):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-62
dc.relation/*ref*/30. da Silva G, Benitez A, Girotto A, Tarod A, Vidotto M, Garcia J, Freitas J, Headley S, Vidotto O. Occurrence of Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma platys in household dogs from northern Parana. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2012; 21(4):379-85 https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612012005000009
dc.relation/*ref*/31. Mircean V, Dumitrache M, Györke A, Pantchev N, Jodies R, Cozma V, el al. Seroprevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis and tick-borne infections (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Ehrlichia canis) in dogs from Romania Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012; 12(7):595-604. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2011.0915
dc.relation/*ref*/32. Xia Z, Yu D, Mao J, Zhang Z, Yu J. The occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma phagocytophium in dogs in China. J Helminthol. 2012; 86(2):185-189. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x11000198
dc.relation/*ref*/33. Berzina, I. Matise I. Seroprevalence against Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and occurence of antibody co-expression with Anaplasma phagocytophilum in dogs in Latvia. Ir Vet J. 2013; 66(1):1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-66-9
dc.relation/*ref*/34. Costa L, Rembeck K, Passos L, Ribeiro M. Factors associated with epidemiology of Anaplasma platys in dogs in rural and urban areas of Minas Gerais State, Brazil, Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2013; 109(3-4):321-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.10.011
dc.relation/*ref*/35. Ebani V, Bertelloni F, Turchi B, Cerri D. Serological and molecular survey of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Italian hunting dogs. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013; 20(2):289-292. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23772578
dc.relation/*ref*/36. Lasta C, Do Santos A, Messick J, Oliveira S, Biondo A, Viera R, et al. Molecular detection of Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma platys in dogs in Southern Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2013; 22(3):360-366. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612013000300007
dc.relation/*ref*/37. Santos A, Thome S, Baldani C, Silva C, Peixoto M, Pires M, et al. Molecular epidemiology of the emerging zoonosis agent Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Foggie, 1949) in dogs and ixodid ticks in Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2013; 11(6):348-358. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-348
dc.relation/*ref*/38. Volgina N, Romashov B, Romashova N, Shtannikov A. Prevalence of borreliosis, anaplasmosis, ehrlichiosis and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs and vectors in Voronezh Reserve (Russia) Reserva Voronezh, Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013; 36(6):567-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2013.08.003
dc.relation/*ref*/39. Krämer F, Schaper R, Schunack B, Połozowski A, Piekarska J, Szwedko A, et al. Serological detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis antibodies and Dirofilaria immitis antigen in a countrywide survey in dogs in Poland. Parasitol Res. 2014; 113(9):3229–3239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-3985-7
dc.relation/*ref*/40. Lanza M, Zieger U, Qurollo B, Hegarty B, Pultorak E, Kumthekar S, et al. Intraoperative bleeding in dogs from Grenada seroreactive to Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis. J Vet Intern Med. 2014; 28(6):1702-1707. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12442
dc.relation/*ref*/41. McCown, M, Monterroso V, Cardona W. Surveillance for Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, and Dirofilaria immitis in Dogs From Three Cities in Colombia. J Spec Oper Med. 2014; 14(1): 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-6033-1
dc.relation/*ref*/42. Santamaria A, Calzada J, Saldaña A, Yabsley M, Gottdenker N. Molecular diagnosis and species identification of Ehrlichia and Anaplasma infections in dogs from Panama, Central Americ. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014; 14(5):368-370. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2013.1488
dc.relation/*ref*/43. Dahmani M, Marié J, Mediannikov O, Raoult D, Davoust B. First identification of Anaplasma platys in the blood of dogs from French Guiana. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015; 15(2):170-172. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2014.1720
dc.relation/*ref*/44. Dahmani M, Loudahi A, Mediannikov O, Fenollar F, Raoult D, Davoust B. Molecular detection of Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis in dogs from Kabylie, Algeria Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015; 6(2):198-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.12.007
dc.relation/*ref*/45. Yuasa Y, Tsai Y, Chang C, Hsu T, Chou C. The prevalence of Anaplasma platys and a potential novel Anaplasma species exceed that of Ehrlichia canis in asymptomatic dogs and Rhipicephalus sanguineus in Taiwan. J Vet Med Sci. 2017; 79(9):1494-1502. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.17-0224
dc.relation/*ref*/46. Párraga M, Gonzatti M, Aso P. Diagnosis of Venezuelan Equine Anaplasmosis by Polymerase Chain Reaction. Revista Científica, FCV-LUZ. 2016; 26(6):366-373. http://www.saber.ula.ve/bitstream/handle/123456789/43191/articulo3.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
dc.relation/*ref*/47. Corona B, Rodriguez M, Martinez S. Anaplasmosis Bovina. Revista electrónica RedVet. 2004; 6(4):1-27. http://www.veterinaria.org/revistas/redvet/n040405/040511.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/48. Corona González B, Obregón D, Alemán Y, Alfonso P, Vega E, Díaz A, Martinez S. Tendencias en el diagnóstico de la anaplasmosis bovina. Rev Salud Anim. 2014; 36(2):73-79. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0253-570X2014000200001
dc.sourceJournal MVZ Cordoba; Vol. 24 No. 2 (2019): Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 24(2) Mayo-Agosto 2019; 7239-7247en-US
dc.sourceRevista MVZ Córdoba; Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2019): Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 24(2) Mayo-Agosto 2019; 7239-7247es-ES
dc.source1909-0544
dc.source0122-0268
dc.subjectAnaplasmaen-US
dc.subjectcaninesen-US
dc.subjectmeta-analysisen-US
dc.subjectprevalenceen-US
dc.subjectAnaplasmaes-ES
dc.subjectcaninoses-ES
dc.subjectmetanálisises-ES
dc.subjectprevalenciaes-ES
dc.titleSystematization of the prevalence of Anaplasma spp. in canines and meta-analysis of A. platys and A. phagocytophilumen-US
dc.titleSistematización de la prevalencia de Anaplasma spp., en caninos y metanálisis de A. platys y A. phagocytophilumes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución