Regional Research Intensive Clusters and Science Parks

dc.creatorEuropean Commission
dc.creatorSaublens, Christian
dc.creatorBonas, George
dc.creatorHusso, Kai
dc.creatorKomárek, Pavel
dc.creatorkoschatzky, Knut
dc.creatorOughton, Christine
dc.creatorSantos Pereira, Tiago
dc.creatorThomas, Bernd
dc.creatorWathen, Mark
dc.date2016-05-17T03:31:46Z
dc.date2016-05-17T03:31:46Z
dc.date2007-09
dc.dateinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-01-31
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T20:02:54Z
dc.date.available2022-12-07T20:02:54Z
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11146/463
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5316364
dc.description"In this report, Research-intensive clusters (RICs) are defined as clusters that predominantly rely on research and development (R&D) as a source of their innovativeness and competitiveness. Such clusters are often based on strong partnership and collaboration between enterprises and public research organisations, including universities. RICs are market driven but usually receive support from public or semi-public bodies. Due to their research intensity, RICs are evolving in the proximity of universities or R&D institutes enabling strong network relations that foster the exchange of knowledge and human resources. Science parks are largely regarded as key elements of the research based regional development policy and can be complementary to RICs..."
dc.descriptionComisión Europera
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherComisión Europera
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantic/openAccess
dc.sourceAsheim, B. T. (1995). Regionale innovasjonssystem – en sosialt og territorielt forankret teknologipolitikk. Nordisk Samhällsgeografisk Tidskrift 20, 17–34.
dc.sourceAsheim, B. T. (1996). Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: a condition for prosperity? European Planning Studies 4: 4, 379–400.
dc.sourceAsheim, B. T. (1998). Territoriality and economics: on the substantial contribution of economic geography. In Jonsson, O. & O.-L. Olander (eds.): Economic Geography in Transitions, the Swedish Geographical Yearbook 74: 98–109.
dc.sourceBoschma, R.A. (2005). Proximity and innovation. A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39, 61–74.
dc.sourceBoschma, R.A. & K. Frenken (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6, 273–302.
dc.sourceBoschma, R.A. & R. Kloosterman (2005). Clustering, learning and regional development. In Boschma, R.A. & R.C. Kloosterman (eds.): Learning from clusters. A critical assessment from an economic-geographical perspective, 1–15. Springer Verlag, Dordrecht.
dc.sourceBoschma, R.A. & J.G. Lambooy (1999). Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9, 411–429.
dc.sourceCamagni, R. (1991; ed.). Innovation networks. Spatial perspectives. Belhaven Press, London.
dc.sourceCollis, C., T. Donnelly & M. Hyry (2005). Sectoral Change and Regional Economic Development in the Oulu Region of Northern Finland: the role of the High-Tech Industrial Cluster by the Arctic Circle. A paper presented at the Regional Studies Association’s international conference on ‘Regional growth agendas’, 28.–31.5.2005, University of Aalborg, Denmark.
dc.sourceCooke, P. (1998). Global clustering and regional innovation: systemic integration in Wales. In Braczyk, H.-J., P. Cooke & M. Heidenreich (eds): Regional innovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world, 245–262. UCL Press, London.
dc.sourceCooke, P., P. Boekholt, N. Schall & G. Schienstock (1996). Regional innovation systems: Concepts, analysis and typology. Paper presented at EU-RESTPOR Conference "Global Comparison of Regional RTD and Innovation Strategies for Development and Cohesion", Brussels 19.–21.9.1996. Cardiff University, Cardiff.
dc.sourceCooke P., H.-J. Braczyk & M. Heidenreich (2004; eds.). Regional innovation systems – the role of governances in a globalized world. Second Edition. Routledge, London.
dc.sourceDicken, P. (1992). Global shift. Paul Chapman, London.
dc.sourceDosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy 11, 147–162.
dc.sourceDosi, G. (1984). Technical change and industrial transformation. Macmillan, London.
dc.sourceDosi, G., C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. Soete (1988; eds.). Technical change and economic theory. Frances Pinter, London.
dc.sourceEtzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy 32, 109–121.
dc.sourceEtzkowitz, H. & L. Leydesdorff (1997). Universities in the global economy: a triple helix of government–industry–government relations. Cassell Academic, London.
dc.sourceEtzkowitz, H. & L. Leydesdorff (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29, 109–123.
dc.sourceFeldman, M.P. & R. Florida (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84, 210–229.
dc.sourceFlorida, R. & D.F. Smith Jr. (1993). Venture capital formation, investment, and regional industrialization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83, 434–451.
dc.sourceFreeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance. Lessons from Japan. Frances Pinter, London.
dc.sourceFreeman, C. (1992). The economics of hope. Essays on technical change, economic growth and the environment. Frances Pinter, London
dc.sourceHayter, R. (1997). The dynamics of industrial location. The factory, the firm and the production system. Wiley, Chichester.
dc.sourceHenderson, D. & K. Morgan (1999). Regions as laboratories: the rise of the regional experimentalism in Europe. In Wolfe, D. & M. Gertler (eds): Innovation and social learning. Macmillan and St Martin’s Press, New York.
dc.sourceKeeble, D. & F. Wilkinson (1999). Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Studies, 34, 295–303.
dc.sourceKoschatzky, K. (2005). The regionalization of innovation policy: new options for regional change? In Fuchs, G. & P. Shapira (eds.): Rethinking regional innovation: path dependency or regional breakthrough? 223–248. Springer, New York.
dc.sourceKristensen, F. S. (1998). Understanding learning in technological trajectories: combining organizational integration and industrial dynamics. Paper presented at 1998 DRUID summer conference on ‘Competence, governance and entrepreneurship’, 9.–11.6.1998, Bornholm, Denmark. <http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/ds1998-21.pdf>
dc.sourceLandabaso, M., C. Oughton & K. Morgan (2001). Innovation networks and regional policy in Europe. In Koschatzy, K., M. Kulicke & A. Zenker (eds.): Innovation networks: concepts and challenges in the European perspective. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
dc.sourceLandabaso, M., C. Oughton & K. Morgan (2003). Learning regions in Europe: theory, policy and practice through the RIS experience. In Gibson, D., C. Stolp, P. Conceição & M. Heitor (eds.): Systems and policies for the global learning economy. Praeger, London.
dc.sourceLarsson, S. & A. Malmberg (1999). Innovations, competitiveness and local embeddedness: a study of machinery producers in Sweden. Geografiska Annaler B 81: 1, 1–18.
dc.sourceLeydesdorff, L. (1997). The new communication regime of university–industry–government relations. In Etzkowtiz, H. & L. Leydesdorff (eds.): Universities in the global economy: a triple helix of government–industry–government relations, 106–117. Cassell Academic, London.
dc.sourceLeydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy 29, 243–255.
dc.sourceLeydesdorff, L. & H. Etzkowitz (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science & Public Policy 25, 195–203.
dc.sourceLundvall, B.-Å. (1992; ed.). National systems of innovation. Pinter, London.
dc.sourceLundvall, B.-Å. & S. Borras (1999). The globalising learning economy: implication for innovation policy. DGXII-TSER report. European Commission, Brussels
dc.sourceLundvall, B.-Å. & B. Johnson (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies 2, 23–42.
dc.sourceMalerba, F. & L. Orsenigo (1993). Technological regimes and firm behaviour. Industrial and Corporate Change 2, 45–71.
dc.sourceMartin, R. & P. Sunley (2003). Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography 3: 1, 5–35.
dc.sourceMetcalfe, J. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In Stoneman, P. (ed.): Handbook of economics of innovation and technology change. Blackwell, Oxford.
dc.sourceNelson, R. R. (1993). A retrospective. In Nelson, R.R. (ed.): National innovation systems. A comparative analysis, 505–523. Oxford University Press, New York.
dc.sourceNiosi, J. (2002). National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective). Why some are slow learners. Research Policy 31, 291–302
dc.sourceOECD (2001). Cities and regions in the new learning economy. OECD, Paris.
dc.sourceOughton, C., M. Landabaso & K. Morgan (2002). The regional innovation paradox: innovation policy and industrial policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer 27, 97–110.
dc.sourcePatel, P. & K. Pavitt (1994). The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems. OECD, STI Review 14, 9–32
dc.sourcePerez, C. (2004). Technological revolutions, paradigm shifts and socio-institutional change. In Reinert, E. (ed.): Globalization, economic development and inequality: an alternative perspective, 217–242. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
dc.sourcePorter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New York.
dc.sourcePorter, M. E. (1999). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, November–December, 77–90.
dc.sourceScott, A. J. (1986). Industrial organization and location: division of labour, the firm and spatial process. Economic Geography 62, 215–231.
dc.sourceScott, A. J. (1988). New industrial spaces: flexible production organization and regional development in North America and Europe. Pion, London.
dc.sourceScott, A. J. (1992). The role of large producers in industrial districts: a case study of high technology systems houses in Southern California. Regional Studies 26, 265–275.
dc.sourceSimmie, J. & J. Sennett (1999). Innovative clusters: global or local linkages? National Institute Economic Review 170, 87–98.
dc.sourceStorper, M. (1993). Regional “World” of production: learning and innovation in the technology districts of France, Italy and the USA. Regional Studies 27, 433–455.
dc.subjectCiencia, Tecnología e Innovación
dc.subjectInvestigación científica
dc.subjectParques de investigación
dc.subjectParques tecnológicos
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectTechnological innovations
dc.subjectTechnology parks
dc.subjectTechnology transfer
dc.titleRegional Research Intensive Clusters and Science Parks
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/book


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución