The choice of innovation policy instruments

dc.creatorBorrás, Susana
dc.creatorEdquist, Charles
dc.date2016-04-16T20:01:17Z
dc.date2016-04-16T20:01:17Z
dc.date2013-04-12
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T12:44:22Z
dc.date.available2022-12-07T12:44:22Z
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11146/166
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5297065
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this article is to discuss the different types of instruments of innovation policy, to examine how governments and public agencies in different countries and different times have used these instruments differently, to explore the political nature of instrument choice and design (and associated issues), and to elaborate a set of criteria for the selection and design of the instruments in relation to the formulation of innovation policy. The article argues that innovation policy instruments must be designed and combined into mixes in ways that address the problems of the innovation system. These mixes are often called “policy mix”. The problem-oriented nature of the design of instrument mixes is what makes innovation policy instruments ‘systemic’.
dc.descriptionElsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantic/closedAccess
dc.sourceD. Breznitz, Innovation and the State: Political Choice and Strategies for Growth in Israel, Yale University Press, New Heaven, Taiwan and Ireland, 2007.
dc.sourceE. Vedung, Policy instruments: typologies and theories, in: M.L. Bemelmans-Videc, R.C. Rist, E. Vedung (Eds.), Carrots, Sticks and Sermons. Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, Transaction Publishers, London, 1998
dc.sourceM.-L. Bemelmans-Videc, R.C. Rist, E. Vedung, Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments & Their Evaluation, Transaction, London, 2003.
dc.sourceS.H. Linder, B.G. Peters, The study of policy instruments: four schools of thought, in: B.G. Peters, F.K.M. Nispen (Eds.), Public Policy Instruments. Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1998, pp. 33–45.
dc.sourceC.C. Hood, H.Z. Margetts, The Tools of Government in the Digital Age, Palgrave, London, 2007.
dc.sourceH.A. de Bruijn, H.A.M. Hufen, The traditional approach to policy instruments, in: G.B. Peters, F.K.M. Nispen (Eds.), Public Policy Instruments. Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1998, pp. 11–32.
dc.sourceL.M. Salamon, The tools of government, A Guide to the New Governance, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
dc.sourceD. Lemaire, The stick: regulation as a tool of government, in: M.L. Bemelmans-Videc, R.C. Rist, E. Verdung (Eds.), Carrots, Sticks and Sermons. Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, Transaction Publishers, London, 1998, pp. 59–76.
dc.sourceJ. Jordana, D. Levi-Faur, The politics of regulation in the age of governance, in: J. Jordana, D. Levi-Faur (Eds.), The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, Routledge, London, 2004.
dc.sourceD.C. Mowery, A.A. Ziedonis, Numbers, quality, and entry: how has the Bayh-Dole Act affected U.S. university patenting and licensing, in: A.B. Jaffe, L. Josh, S. Scott (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma, 2000.
dc.sourceB. Lepori, P. van den Besselaar, M. Dinges, B. Potí, E. Reale, S. Slipersaeter, J. Thèves, B. van der Meulen, Comparing the evolution of national research policies: what patterns of change? Sci. Public Policy 34 (2007) 372–388.
dc.sourceK. Blind, The Economics of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2004.
dc.sourceC. Edquist, Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges, in: J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, R. Nelson (Eds.), Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.
dc.sourceOECD, OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: China, OECD, Paris, 2008.
dc.sourceC. Edquist, J.M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Public procurement for innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy, Res. Policy 41 (2013) 1757–1769
dc.sourceP. Mohnen, L.-H. Röller, Complementarities in innovation policy, Eur. Econ. Rev. 49 (2005) 1431–1450.
dc.sourceC. Edquist, Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures), Ind. Corp. Chang. 20 (2011) 1725–1753.
dc.sourceS. Borrás, D. Tsagdis, Cluster policies in Europe, Firms, Institutions and Governance, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2008.
dc.sourceR. Smits, S. Kuhlmann, The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy, Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy 1 (2004) 4–32.
dc.sourceK. Flanagan, E. Uyarra, M. Laranja, Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation, Res. Policy 40 (2011) 702–713.
dc.sourceJ. Serris, Report of the CREST Expert Group on Public Research Spending and Policy Mixes, European Commission, Brussels, 2004, p. 71.
dc.sourceS. Borrás, Policy learning and organizational capacities in innovation policies, Sci. Public Policy 38 (2011).
dc.sourceP. Leifeld, S. Haunss, Political discourse networks and the conflict over software patents in Europe, Eur. J. Pollut. Res. 51 (2012) 382–409.
dc.sourceS. Borrás, The governance of the European patent system: effective and legitimate? Econ. Soc. 35 (2006) 594–610.
dc.subjectPolítica científica -- Análisis
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicas
dc.subjectDesarrollo científico y tecnológico
dc.subjectSistemas de innovación
dc.subjectPolíticas públicas
dc.subjectPolicy mix
dc.subjectInnovation system
dc.subjectInnovation policy instruments
dc.subjectGovernance
dc.subjectRegulation
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.titleThe choice of innovation policy instruments
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución