Measuring the success of science parks: performance monitoring and evaluation

Full Paper for the XXVIII IASP World Conference on Science and Technology Parks, 2011

dc.creatorDabrowska, Justyna
dc.date2016-04-26T05:13:01Z
dc.date2016-04-26T05:13:01Z
dc.date2011-02-18
dc.dateinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-01-31
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T12:10:30Z
dc.date.available2022-12-07T12:10:30Z
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11146/265
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5296485
dc.description"Measuring the success of science parks is not a straightforward task. The hypothesis that science parks have been successful and effective cannot be proved or disapproved. Policy and decision makers need strong arguments to continue allocating resources to science parks, the media are increasingly interested in the science park phenomenon, science parks‘ stakeholders need to know how science parks perform and what added value they create within the regional knowledge economy. Evaluating the performance of science parks is becoming a more and more important issue for the science park industry..."
dc.descriptionManchester Science parks
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherManchester Science parks
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantic/openAccess
dc.sourceAllen, J. (2007) Third Generation Science Parks, Manchester Science Parks
dc.sourceAngle Technology (2003) Evaluation of the past and future economic contributions of the UK Science Park Movement, UK Science Park Association
dc.sourceColombo, M., & Delmastro, M. (2002) How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy, Research Policy, 31, 1103-1122
dc.sourceFerguson, R., & Olofsson C. (2004), Science parks and the development of NTBFs - location, survival and growth, Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 5–17
dc.sourceFukagawa, N. (2006), Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based Firms, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 381-400
dc.sourceHodgson, B. (1996) A methodological framework to analyse the impact of Science and Technology Parks, in M. Guedes & P. Formica (Eds.), The Economic of Science Parks, IASP and AURRP
dc.sourceKaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992), ‗The balanced scorecard and measures that drive performance‘, Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 71-9
dc.sourceLeyden, D.P., Link, A.N., Siegel, D.S. (2007) A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Decision to Locate on a University Research Park, Engineering Management Journal, IEEE Transactions; 55(1), 23-28
dc.sourceLindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2002) Science parks and the growth of new technologybased firms – academic-industry links, innovation and markets, Research Policy, 31, 859-876
dc.sourceLindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2003) Science parks location and new technology-based firms in Sweden— implications for strategy and performance, Small Business Economics, 20, 245–258
dc.sourceLindelöf, P., &, Löfsten, H. (2004) Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University industry links for technology transfer, Journal of Technology Transfer 29, 311–326
dc.sourceLindelöf, P., &, Löfsten, H. (2005) R&D networks and product innovation patterns – academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on science parks, Technovation, 25, 1025-1037
dc.sourceLink, A., Scott, J. (2007) The economics of university research parks, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 23, Number 4, 2007, pp.661 – 674
dc.sourceLink, A., Scott, J.T. (2003) US science parks: The diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1323-1356
dc.sourceLink, A. Siegel, D. (2007) Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technological Change, Oxford University Press, Oxford
dc.sourceLuger, M. I., & Goldstein, H. A. (1991) Technology in the garden, Chapel Hill, UNC Press
dc.sourceMassey, D., Quintas, P., & Wield, D. (1992) High-tech fantasies. Science parks in society, science and space, London: Routledge
dc.sourceMonck, C., Peters, K. (2009) Science Parks as an Instrument of Regional Competitiveness: Measuring Success and Impact, IASP 2009 annual conference proceedings
dc.sourceMonck, C. (2010) Performance monitoring and evaluation, UKSPA conference proceedings
dc.sourceMonck, C., Porter, R., Quintas, P., Storey, D.J., Wynarczyk, P. (1988) Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms, Croom Helm and Peat Marwick McLintock, London
dc.sourceNeely, A; Adams, C, and Kennerley, M., (2002), ‗The Performance Prism - The Scorecard for Measuring and ManagingBusiness Success", FinancialTimes
dc.sourceNeely, A., (2002), Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.sourceSiegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003) Assessing the impact of University Science parks on research productivity: Exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1357–1369
dc.sourceSquicciarini, M. (2008) Science Parks‘ tenants versus out-of-Park firms: who innovates more? A duration model, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 45-7
dc.subjectParques de investigación
dc.subjectinvestigación científica
dc.subjectInnovaciones tecnológicas
dc.subjectResearch parks
dc.subjectResearch
dc.subjectTechnological innovations
dc.titleMeasuring the success of science parks: performance monitoring and evaluation
dc.titleFull Paper for the XXVIII IASP World Conference on Science and Technology Parks, 2011
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución