dc.contributorCoral, Lucila Adriani de Almeida
dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1041-5878
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0455559038548177
dc.contributorSautter, Klaus Dieter
dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9699-0296
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6533165854449384
dc.contributorOliveira, Cintia Mara Ribas de
dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0051-9991
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2950000716449247
dc.contributorKummer, Larissa
dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-2045
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7892203021390255
dc.contributorCoral, Lucila Adriani de Almeida
dc.contributorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1041-5878
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0455559038548177
dc.creatorJousseph, Deise Coelho
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-01
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T20:14:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-06T15:41:35Z
dc.date.available2020-12-01
dc.date.available2021-04-05T20:14:14Z
dc.date.available2022-12-06T15:41:35Z
dc.date.created2020-12-01
dc.date.created2021-04-05T20:14:14Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-04
dc.identifierJOUSSEPH, Deise Coelho. Métodos multicriteriais de hierarquização para avaliação de aspectos e impactos ambientais em organizações. 2020. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência e Tecnologia Ambiental) - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 2020.
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/24626
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5269317
dc.description.abstractCommercial, financial and marketing advantages have encouraged many companies to adopt the Environmental Management System certificated in accordance with ISO 14001. Some of the most critical steps of this process are the identification and assessment of environmental aspects and impacts associated with corporate activities and the prioritization of actions to minimize these impacts. The ISO 14001 does not specify a method for this assessment and different models are used by companies. Here we applied three different multicriteria methods for evaluation and ranking of environmental aspects, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), one adaptation of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Marazza, Bandini e Contin (2010) method (MRZ). The assessment of Environmental Aspects and Impacts using each one of these methods was performed in two different Brazilian companies, one of them was industrial and the other was the service company. First, was applied the FMEA and the MRZ for all Aspects and Impacts from companies and then, AHP was applied for the 10 Aspects and Impacts with higher graduation on FMEA and MRZ. The analysis of the results of the evaluation made through the three methods, showed that any one of them can be used for the Ais evaluation, however the AHP showed restrictions for evaluation more than 20 Ais. The MRZ proved to be innovative when considering governance for analysis and the FMEA method presented advantage in relation to the others, mainly related of easily application of it, being the most recommended for this ranking.
dc.publisherUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
dc.publisherCuritiba
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia Ambiental
dc.publisherUTFPR
dc.rightsembargoedAccess
dc.subjectGestão ambiental
dc.subjectImpacto ambiental - Avaliação
dc.subjectISO 14001
dc.subjectProcesso decisório por critério múltiplo - Aspectos ambientais
dc.subjectEnvironmental management
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact analysis
dc.subjectISO 14001 Standard
dc.subjectMultiple criteria decision making - Environmental aspects
dc.titleMétodos multicriteriais de hierarquização para avaliação de aspectos e impactos ambientais em organizações
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución