dc.contributorLima, Rafael Sene de
dc.contributorLima, Rafael Sene de
dc.contributorMarchi Neto, Ismael de
dc.contributorSalvo, Ricardo de Vasconcelos
dc.creatorMedeiros, Rodrigo da Silva
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-22T16:52:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-06T14:25:52Z
dc.date.available2021-06-22T16:52:32Z
dc.date.available2022-12-06T14:25:52Z
dc.date.created2021-06-22T16:52:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-09
dc.identifierMEDEIROS, Rodrigo da Silva. Estudo do comportamento de spray diesel em injeção direta através de modelos macroscópicos. 2021. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Bacharelado em Engenharia Mecânica) - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Londrina, 2021.
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/25347
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5248859
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this paper is to analyze the robustness of one and two zones macroscopic models for diesel engine spray penetration and angle. The analysis was performed comparing models and published literature experimental results. The experimental data obtained ranged a wide variety of fuels (such as pure mineral diesel, biodiesel of many origin as well as some single component fuels) at various injection and ambient pressures, so that the robustness could be analyzed at different input conditions. Based on the experimental data, the model from Hiroyasu and Arai (1990) presented the best results, basing robustness on the ability to produce good R² consistently for all the experimental conditions for spray penetration prediction. It was also observed that the results of this model were able to predict the progression of spray penetration for several experimental conditions, mainly during the intermediate stages of the injection process. This model also presented the best results while using pure methyl oleate and mineral diesel. The second model in terms of robustness was the one of Dent (1971), followed by the one of Bahl et al. (2016). The least robust of the four studied models was the one of Kegl and Lešnik (2018). The poor quality of the results can be explained by the use of the injection pressure. In regard to the spray angle, it was concluded that none of the models are genuinely robust. Some spray angle models were able to show good results for certain experimental conditions, but none of them were able to consistently show good results for all experimental conditions. For future works, it’s suggested an analysis using various injection nozzles and fuels, while varying the ambient temperature as well as the pressures used. It is also recommended to use own experiments as that would make it possible to use more models since it would be possible to obtain the parameters used in them. Using own experiments would also reduce the amount of external factors.
dc.publisherUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
dc.publisherLondrina
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherEngenharia Mecânica
dc.publisherUTFPR
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectMotores a diesel
dc.subjectBiocombustíveis
dc.subjectAutomóveis - Motores - Sistemas de injeção de combustível
dc.subjectDiesel motor
dc.subjectBiomass energy
dc.subjectAutomobiles - Motors - Fuel injection systems
dc.titleEstudo do comportamento de spray diesel em injeção direta através de modelos macroscópicos
dc.typebachelorThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución