dc.contributor | Pilatti, Luiz Alberto | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/4854832473320818 | |
dc.contributor | Oliveira Junior, Constantino Ribeiro de | |
dc.contributor | Frasson, Antonio Carlos | |
dc.contributor | Stadler, Rita de Cássia da Luz | |
dc.contributor | Pilatti, Luiz Alberto | |
dc.creator | Vieira, Flávio Madalosso | |
dc.date.accessioned | 5000-01-01 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-05T13:51:08Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-06T14:10:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 5000-01-01 | |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-05T13:51:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-06T14:10:10Z | |
dc.date.created | 5000-01-01 | |
dc.date.created | 2018-10-05T13:51:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-11-19 | |
dc.identifier | VIEIRA, Flávio Madalosso. Instrumento de revisão redacional e metodológica para aplicação avaliativa em trabalhos acadêmicos. 2010. 76 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia) - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Ponta Grossa, 2010. | |
dc.identifier | http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/3474 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5242622 | |
dc.description.abstract | This work aims to study the problem identification and non-compliance of the use of the Portuguese language and the applicability of the norms of ABNT, and to develop a specific tool to help optimize the design and evaluation of academic all levels of education. Based on the identification of problems in theses, took place regarding the review of the literature, we developed a relationship of non-compliance, hence the origin of the first version of the checklist , under the product to deal with it because, after validation by physicians in the methodology used in the pilot study, which provided grants for improvement work, such as the attribution of the label each element and then modified as described and applied to a group of 96 employees, including graduate students and teachers, who volunteered in response to the need to readjust some items in the list provided for in section Results and discussion but it became clear to users that the product is effective, simple to apply and provides real-world conditions to facilitate their use, regardless of level of education in which you want to apply. | |
dc.publisher | Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná | |
dc.publisher | Ponta Grossa | |
dc.publisher | Brasil | |
dc.publisher | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia | |
dc.publisher | UTFPR | |
dc.rights | embargoedAccess | |
dc.subject | Redação técnica | |
dc.subject | Norma linguística | |
dc.subject | Língua portuguesa | |
dc.subject | Technical writing | |
dc.subject | Standard language | |
dc.subject | Portuguese language | |
dc.title | Instrumento de revisão redacional e metodológica para aplicação avaliativa em trabalhos acadêmicos | |
dc.type | masterThesis | |