dc.creator | Núñez-Bravo, Narledis | |
dc.creator | Sánchez-Güette, Lilibeth | |
dc.creator | Sotelo-Berrio, Vanessa | |
dc.creator | Miranda-Medina, Carlos | |
dc.creator | Mantilla-Morrón, Mirary | |
dc.creator | Galeano-Muñoz, Luisa | |
dc.creator | Moreno- Bravo, Mariyan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-16T20:32:22Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-14T20:05:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-16T20:32:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-14T20:05:38Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-10-16T20:32:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier | 26107988 | |
dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/4158 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5186868 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objetivo: Identificar las principales barreras y/o obstáculos
que personas con discapacidad vencieron para lograr el emprendimiento.
Metodología: Se desarrolló un estudio de caso mediante
experiencias de vida de tres sujetos que han logrado ser emprendedores
luego de sufrir una discapacidad. Se utilizó un
enfoque cualitativo, mediante entrevista abierta, abordando
categorías de emprendimiento y discapacidad; desarrollando
los siguientes tópicos: factores sociales, individuales y motivacionales,
barreras y limitaciones.
Resultados y Conclusiones: Se encontró que los principales
factores y/o motivaciones que llevan a una persona
con discapacidad a ser emprendedor están: las creencias
religiosas, la perseverancia, las redes sociales y familiares.
Así mismo se encontró como característica en común la percepción
y análisis de la realidad desde una óptica emprendedora.
En cuanto a las barreras y limitaciones se pueden
resaltar la inequidad, la falta de oportunidad, escepticismo
a la diversidad, barreras físicas, culturales y económicas, y
falta de políticas inclusivas. | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To identify the main barriers or obstacles that disabled
individuals overcome to achieve entrepreneurship.
Methodology: We developed a case study using life experiences
of three subjects who have managed to be entrepreneurs
after suffering a disability. We used a qualitative approach,
through open interview, addressing categories of
entrepreneurship and disability; developing the following
topics: social, individual, and motivational factors, barriers
and limitations.
Results and Conclusion: Our results indicate that the main
factors or motivations that lead a person with a disability to
be entrepreneur are: religious beliefs, the perseverance, and
the social and family networks. Also found as characteristic
in common perception and analysis of the situation from an
entrepreneurial perspective. As barriers and limitations can
be highlighted: inequality, lack of opportunity, skepticism to
diversity, physical, cultural and economic barriers, and lack of
inclusive policies. | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Sociedad Venezolana de Farmacología Clínica y Terapéutica | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | |
dc.source | Revista AVFT-Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica | |
dc.source | Vol. 38 No. 2 (2019) | |
dc.source | http://www.revistaavft.com/images/revistas/2019/avft_3_2019/6_emprendimient.pdf | |
dc.source | Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Informe mundial sobre la
discapacidad. Malta: OMS-Banco Mundial. Ginebra- Suiza. 2011. | |
dc.source | Gómez LY, Avella A, Morales LA. Observatorio de Discapacidad de
Colombia. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Pública. 2015; 33(2): XXX. | |
dc.source | Departamento Nacional de Planeación. Consejo Nacional de Política
Económica y Social (CONPES). CONPES Social 116 de 2013,
Política Pública Nacional de Discapacidad e Inclusión Social. Bogotá:
DNP; 2013. | |
dc.source | Naciones Unidas. Informe de la Alta Comisionada de las Naciones
Unidas para los Derechos Humanos sobre los progresos alcanzados
en la aplicación de las recomendaciones contenidas en el estudio
sobre los derechos humanos y la discapacidad (A/HRC/4/75).
2007. | |
dc.source | Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Clasificación internacional
del funcionamiento, de la discapacidad y de la salud: CIF. IMSERSO.
Madrid: OMS. Ginebra-Suiza. 2001. | |
dc.source | Departamento de Planeación. Consejo Nacional de Política Económica
y Social República de Colombia (CONPES 166). Política
Pública Nacional de Discapacidad e Inclusión Social. Bogotá D.C.
2013. | |
dc.source | Burns N, Groven S. Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. En:
N. Burns, S. K. Grove, Investigación en Enfermería (3ª Ed.) (pp.
384-430). Génova: Elsevier España S.A. 2004. | |
dc.source | Okuda M, Gómez C. Métodos en investigación cualitativa: Triangulación.
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría. 2005;34(1):118-124. | |
dc.source | Arias M. (2000). La triangulación metodológica: sus principios alcances
y limitaciones. Investigación y educación en enfermería.
2000;18(1):13-26. | |
dc.source | Minuchin S, Fishman HC. Técnicas de terapia familiar. Barcelona:
Paidós. 1984. | |
dc.source | Bordignon N. El desarrollo psicosocial de Eric Erikson. El diagrama
epigenético del adulto Revista Lasallista de Investigación. 2005; 2
(2): 50-63. | |
dc.source | Esquivel P. Cultura emprendedora en las personas con discapacidad.
(Tesis de Maestría). Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.
2010. | |
dc.source | Jiménez LA, Verdugo AM, Canal BR, Huete GA. Situación de las
personas con discapacidad en Castilla-La Mancha. Las necesidades
percibidas. | |
dc.source | Eirionnach. Irish Clergy disabilities act. Notes and Queries.
1864;6(135): 89. | |
dc.source | Lee J. Dangers and disabilities of licentiates of the college of physicians,
edinburgh. 1873; 101(285): 255. | |
dc.source | Robins E. On “The Disabilities of Inspectors of Nuisances, and their
Remedy. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of
Health. 1884; 5(1): 121-128. | |
dc.source | Steward J. Disabilities of irish diplomates. The Lancet.1890;
35(3475): 766. | |
dc.source | Laffan P. The Dublin Journal of Medical Science. 1892; 93(4): 280-
284. | |
dc.source | Gant W. The disabilities of irish graduates. British Medical Journa.
1892; 2(1649): 330. | |
dc.source | Whigham B, Mattson B. Attitudes influencing employment of the
handicapped. Journal of Employment Counseling. 1969; 6(2): 72-
78. | |
dc.source | Lundberg O. Methods of studying the risk process in disability insurance.
ASTIN Bulletin. 1969; 5(2): 267-273. | |
dc.source | Williams L. Prognosis and disablement pensions. Lancet.1964;
14(28): 1186-1187. | |
dc.source | Tiler L. communicating about people with disabilities: Does the Language
We Use Make a Difference?.Business Communication Quarterly.
1990; 53(3): 65-67. | |
dc.source | Post J, Robins R. (1993). The Captive King and His Captive Court:
The Psychopolitical Dynamics of the Disabled Leader and His Inner
Circle. Family Business Review. 1993; 6(2): 203-221. | |
dc.source | Baldwin M, Zeager L, Flacco P. Gender differences in wage losses
from impairments: estimates from the Survey of Income and
Program Participation. Journal of Human Resources. 1994; 29(3):
865-887. | |
dc.source | Baldwin M, Johnson W. Labor market discrimination against men
with disabilities. Journal of Human Resources. 1994; 29(1): 1-19. | |
dc.source | Grzeda J. Disability and Discrimination ‐ a UK Perspective. Business
Ethics: A European Review. 1994; 3(3): 145-147. | |
dc.source | Bordley R. Making social trade-offs among lives, disabilities, and
cost. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1994; 9(2): 135-150. | |
dc.source | Burkhauser R, Gertler P. The Health and Retirement Study: data
quality and early results. Journal of Human Resources.1995; 30(1):
1-318. | |
dc.source | Strudler A. The social construction of genetic abnormality: Ethical
implications for managerial decisions in the workplace. Journal of
Business Ethics. 1994; 13(11): 839-849. | |
dc.source | Fabel O. Disability insurance in an optimal pension scheme. Journal
of Economics Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie.1995; 62(2): 157-
183. | |
dc.source | Miner K, Kingsbury L, Gentling G, Bishop D. Promoting Alcohol-
Free Pregnancy in Minnesota: A Case Study in Social Marketing.
Social Marketin Quarterly. 1995; 2(2): 6-9. | |
dc.source | Burkhauser R, Butler J, Kim Y. The importance of employer accommodation
on the job duration of workers with disabilities: A hazard
model approach. Labour Economics. 1995; 2 (2): 109-130. | |
dc.source | Brockett P, Tankersley E. The genetics revolution, economics, ethics
and insurance. Journal of Business Ethics. 1997; 16(15): 1661-
1176. | |
dc.source | Auerbach A. Quantifying the current U.S. fiscal imbalance. National
Tax Journal. 1997; 50(3): 387-398. | |
dc.source | Bovenberg A. Reforming Social Insurance in the Netherlands. International
Tax and Public Finance. 2000; 7(3), 345-368. | |
dc.source | Kreider B, Riphahn R. Explaining applications to the U.S. disability
system: A semiparametric approach. Journal of Human Resources.
2000; 35(1): 82-115. | |
dc.source | Rao M. Fiscal decentralization in Vietnam: Emerging issues. Hitotsubashi
Journal of Economics.2000; 41(2): 163-177. | |
dc.source | Schaefer K. E-Space Inclusion: A Case for the Americans with Disabilities
Act in Cyberspace. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing.
2003;22(2):223-227. | |
dc.source | Rofman R. The New Pension System in Argentina: Experiences and
Lessons. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice.
2001;26(4):587-610. | |
dc.source | Berthoud R. Disability employment penalties in Britain. Work, Employment
and Society. 2008;22(1):129-148. | |
dc.source | Vinik E, Vinik A. Transcending tradition: Quality of life as the inextricable
link between activities of daily living and specific organ and
disease states. Research in Human Capital and Development.
2008;16:29-52. | |
dc.source | Martin B, Honig B. Inclusive Management Research: Persons with
Disabilities and Self-Employment Activity as an Exemplar. Journal of
Business Ethics. 2019. | |
dc.source | Csillag S, Gyori Z, Svastics C. Long and winding road?: Barriers and
supporting factors as perceived by entrepreneurs with disabilities.
Journal of Enterprising Communities. 2019. | |
dc.source | Cooney T, Licciardi M. The same but different: Understanding entrepreneurial
behaviour in disadvantaged communities. Entrepreneurial
Behaviour: Individual, Contextual and Microfoundational Perspectives.
2019:317-345. | |
dc.source | Tarraga A, Estelles-Miguel S, Gato M, Guillem J. Innovation and
knowledge in the social economy: ICT accessibility. Strategies and
Best Practices in Social Innovation: An Institutional Perspective.
2018:181-188. | |
dc.subject | Discapacidad | |
dc.subject | Emprendimiento | |
dc.subject | Inserción laboral | |
dc.subject | Inclusión social | |
dc.subject | Disability | |
dc.subject | Entrepreneurship | |
dc.subject | Laboral insertion | |
dc.subject | Social inclusion | |
dc.title | Emprendimiento e innovación en personas con discapacidad en Colombia: estudio de casos | |
dc.type | article | |