dc.creatorGantier, Marcelo
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T18:30:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-10T15:38:11Z
dc.date.available2021-02-11T18:30:10Z
dc.date.available2022-11-10T15:38:11Z
dc.date.created2021-02-11T18:30:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-20
dc.identifierO130, Q320, Q340, D740
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ucb.edu.bo/xmlui/handle/20.500.12771/384
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5177372
dc.description.abstractNatural resources are often related to conflicts. The Dal Bo & Dal B ´ o´ (2011) theory states that income shocks affect capital- and labor-intensive sectors differently. Using sub-national cells covering the African continent for 1997-2010, I find that conflicts react differently to positive commodity price shocks depending on their factor intensity. The results show that a positive shock in the capital-intensive mining sector increases conflict likelihood, whereas a positive shock in the labor-intensive agricultural sector reduces it. These impacts are higher for sub-Saharan Africa. When testing heterogeneous effects for the degree of commodity appropriability, historical African-specific factors, and quality of institutions, I find that easily taxed crops behave differently to an increase in international crop prices. In the same vein, I find that neither historical African-specific factors nor the quality of institutions seem to induce differential responses in conflicts to commodity price shocks.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica Boliviana "San Pablo". IISEC.
dc.relationDocumento de Trabajo IISEC-UCB;N° 05/2020
dc.subjectRecursos Naturales
dc.subjectConflictos
dc.subjectCommodity Shocks
dc.titleCommodity Shocks, Factor Intensity and Conflicts in Africa
dc.typeDocumentos de trabajo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución