dc.creatorMuller, Felipe J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-31T19:36:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-09T15:00:35Z
dc.date.available2014-07-31T19:36:37Z
dc.date.available2022-11-09T15:00:35Z
dc.date.created2014-07-31T19:36:37Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ub.edu.ar/handle/123456789/2777
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5168003
dc.description.abstractThis article focuses on the relationship between theoretical orientation and clinical practice in Argentina. Five hundred twenty-five psychotherapists were surveyed in the city of Buenos Aires and the provinces of Buenos Aires, Santa Fe, La Pampa, Neuquén, Chubut, and Rio Negro. Psychoanalysis was chosen by 53.1% of the psychotherapists as the main theory used in their clinical practice. Integrationists made up 39.8% of the sample and represented the 2nd most important group. Within the integrationist group, psychoanalysis was mentioned by 63.2% as the main or base theory, followed by 12.9% mentioning cognitive theory. A longitudinal analysis shows how the trend toward integration of the different theories has grown over the years. These results reveal the importance of psychoanalysis and the trend toward integration within clinical practice in Argentina.
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherUniversidad de Belgrano. Facultad de Humanidades. Proyectos de Investigación
dc.relationJournal of Psychotherapy Integration;Vol 18(4), Dec 2008, 410-420
dc.subjectPsicoterapia
dc.subjectPráctica clínica
dc.subjectPsicoanálisis
dc.subjectIntegración
dc.subjectPsychotherapy
dc.subjectClinical practice
dc.subjectPsychoanalysis
dc.subjectIntegration
dc.titlePsychotherapy in Argentina: Theoretical orientation and clinical practice
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución