The effect of obliging the defendant to show evidence against himself

dc.creatorAmeen Al-Jaf, Fwrat Rostam
dc.date2020-05-05
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-05T02:37:56Z
dc.date.available2022-11-05T02:37:56Z
dc.identifierhttps://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/opcion/article/view/32048
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5141861
dc.descriptionThe study aims to investigate the effect of obliging the defendant to show evidence against himself via comparative qualitative research methods. As a result, the Iraqi legislator, in this article, dealt with the case of the court conviction that the book or the bond is in the possession of the opponent who is required to provide it. In conclusion, obliging the opponent to provide evidence against himself is an exception from the general origin which stipulates that it is not permissible for the opponent to provide evidence against himself.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Zuliaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/opcion/article/view/32048/33285
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2020 Opciónes-ES
dc.sourceOpción; Vol. 36 (2020): Edición Especial Nro. 27; 1386-1398es-ES
dc.source2477-9385
dc.source1012-1587
dc.subjectEvidencees-ES
dc.subjectOpponentses-ES
dc.subjectObligees-ES
dc.subjectProof law.es-ES
dc.titleThe effect of obliging the defendant to show evidence against himselfes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeArtículo revisado por pareses-ES


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución