dc.creatorMalki Ahmad Nasir, Irfan Safrudin, Rodliyah Khuzai,
dc.date2020-05-05
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-05T02:37:43Z
dc.date.available2022-11-05T02:37:43Z
dc.identifierhttps://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/opcion/article/view/32038
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5141851
dc.descriptionThis paper aimed to reveal both the similarities and differences of the four grand theories. Using a literature study approach, this paper synthesized the four schools of thought with newly developed points of view. The results showed that the differences of the four theories were mainly on the basic psychological aspects of humans which are neutral (behaviorism), bad (psychoanalysis), kind (humanism), and pure (Islam). In conclusion, it has been implied that the development of humans is not only from the physical and cognitive aspects but also spiritual aspects which are actually their basic potentials.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad del Zuliaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/opcion/article/view/32038/33275
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2020 Opciónes-ES
dc.sourceOpción; Vol. 36 (2020): Edición Especial Nro. 27; 1229-1244es-ES
dc.source2477-9385
dc.source1012-1587
dc.subjectBehaviorismes-ES
dc.subjectPsychoanalysises-ES
dc.subjectHumanismes-ES
dc.subjectIslames-ES
dc.subjectHumans.es-ES
dc.titleConcepts of humans based on Behaviorism, Psychoanalysis, Humanism and Islames-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeArtículo revisado por pareses-ES


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución