dc.contributores-ES
dc.creatorLópez Astorga, Miguel
dc.date2021-11-30
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-04T18:54:54Z
dc.date.available2022-11-04T18:54:54Z
dc.identifierhttp://erevistas.saber.ula.ve/index.php/lenguayhabla/article/view/17527
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5128374
dc.descriptionThe literature shows that people tend to interpret disjunctions as exclusive. From that fact, this paper describes a study intended to check whether or not that trend can also be observed when disjunction is used. The study was mainly based on an analysis of the semantic possibilities of the disjunctions appearing in a philosophical text. The method of analysis was akin to the one proposed by the theory of mental models to explore reasoning. The results revealed that the number of exclusive disjunctions employed in that text is exactly the same as the one of inclusive disjunctions in it. Hence, it is hard to claim that, in addition to what happens in the interpretation processes, disjunction is often exclusive when used as well.Recibido: 26/07/2021      Aceptado:15/11/2021es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherLengua y Hablaes-ES
dc.relationhttp://erevistas.saber.ula.ve/index.php/lenguayhabla/article/view/17527/21921928750
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2021 Lengua y Hablaes-ES
dc.sourceLengua y Habla; Vol. 25 (2021): ENERO-DICIEMBRE; 24-33es-ES
dc.source2244-811X
dc.source1316-1180
dc.titleInterpretation and use of disjunction in natural language: A study about exclusivity and inclusivityes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typees-ES


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución