dc.contributorFGV
dc.creatorPereira, João André Calviño Marques
dc.creatorSaito, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T13:36:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T20:33:27Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T13:36:49Z
dc.date.available2022-11-03T20:33:27Z
dc.date.created2018-05-10T13:36:49Z
dc.date.issued2015-08
dc.identifier1572-3089
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/23483
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jfs.2015.05.001
dc.identifier000357996700002
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5040642
dc.description.abstractCentral Bank supervision is one of the pillars of capital regulation. Based on a unique database built using supervision data from the Central Bank of Brazil, we evaluate the effectiveness of the Central Bank's supervision over banks given the Central Bank's proprietary credit rating and signaling requests for higher capital buffers. We also examine the main determinants of capital buffer management in addition to supervision. We find evidence that (i) Brazilian Central Bank supervision imposes excess capital buffer needs on banks, especially small and midsize banks; (ii) market discipline may play no role in driving capital ratios; and (iii) the business cycle has a negative influence on bank capital cushions, suggesting pro-cyclical capital management. We conclude that supervision plays a major role in markets where market discipline is weak and for smaller banks which act on pro-cyclical way. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relationJournal of financial stability
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectBank regulation
dc.subjectRegulatory capital
dc.subjectAsset risk
dc.titleHow banks respond to Central Bank supervision: evidence from Brazil
dc.typeArticle (Journal/Review)


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución