dc.contributorEscolas::EPGE
dc.contributorFGV
dc.creatorTerra, Maria Cristina T.
dc.creatorAbreu, Ana Lucia Vahia de
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-13T15:34:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T20:32:24Z
dc.date.available2008-05-13T15:34:16Z
dc.date.available2022-11-03T20:32:24Z
dc.date.created2008-05-13T15:34:16Z
dc.date.issued2005-04-01
dc.identifier0104-8910
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/785
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5040317
dc.description.abstractLooking closely at the PPP argument, it states that the currencies purchasing power should not change when comparing the same basket goods across countries, and these goods should all be tradable. Hence, if PPP is valid at all, it should be captured by the relative price indices that best Öts these two features. We ran a horse race among six di§erent price indices available from the IMF database to see which one would yield higher PPP evidence, and, therefore, better Öt the two features. We used RER proxies measured as the ratio of export unit values, wholesale prices, value added deáators, unit labor costs, normalized unit labor costs and consumer prices, for a sample of 16 industrial countries, with quarterly data from 1975 to 2002. PPP was tested using both the ADF and the DFGLS unit root test of the RER series. The RER measured as WPI ratios was the one for which PPP evidence was found for the larger number of countries: six out of sixteen when we use DF-GLS test with demeaned series. The worst measure of all was the RER based on the ratio of foreign CPIs and domestic WPI. No evidence of PPP at all was found for this measure.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherEscola de Pós-Graduação em Economia da FGV
dc.relationEnsaios Econômicos;588
dc.subjectReal exchange rate
dc.subjectPrice indices
dc.subjectPurchasing power parity
dc.titlePurchasing power parity: the choice of price index
dc.typeWorking Paper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución