dc.contributorEscolas::EPGE
dc.contributorFGV
dc.creatorFerreira, Pedro Cavalcanti
dc.creatorPessôa, Samuel de Abreu
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-13T15:25:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T20:14:34Z
dc.date.available2008-05-13T15:25:46Z
dc.date.available2022-11-03T20:14:34Z
dc.date.created2008-05-13T15:25:46Z
dc.date.issued2005-06-02
dc.identifier0104-8910
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/521
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5034433
dc.description.abstractThis article studies the impact of longevity and taxation on life-cycle decisions and long-run income. Individuals allocate optimally their total lifetime between education, working and retirement. They also decide at each moment how much to save or consume out of their income, and after entering the labor market how to divide their time between labor and leisure. The model incorporates experience-earnings profiles and the return-to-education function that follows evidence from the labor literature. In this setup, increases in longevity raises the investment in education - time in school - and retirement. The model is calibrated to the U.S. and is able to reproduce observed schooling levels and the increase in retirement, as the evidence shows. Simulations show that a country equal to the U.S. but with 20% smaller longevity will be 25% poorer. In this economy, labor taxes have a strong impact on the per capita income, as it decreases labor effort, time at school and retirement age, in addition to the general equilibrium impact on physical capital. We conclude that life-cycle effects are relevant in analyzing the aggregate outcome of taxation.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherEscola de Pós-Graduação em Economia da FGV
dc.relationEnsaios Econômicos;590
dc.titleThe effects of longevity and distortions on education and retirement
dc.typeWorking Paper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución