Pro-competition rules in airport privatization: international experience and the Brazilian case

dc.contributorFGV
dc.creatorPereira Neto, Caio Mário da Silva
dc.creatorCasagrande, Paulo Leonardo
dc.creatorLancieri, Filippo Maria
dc.creatorMoraes, Joaquim Nogueira Porto
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T13:37:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T20:09:44Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T13:37:11Z
dc.date.available2022-11-03T20:09:44Z
dc.date.created2018-05-10T13:37:11Z
dc.date.issued2016-07
dc.identifier0969-6997
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10438/23607
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.03.011
dc.identifier000377733600002
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5032716
dc.description.abstractThis article aims to demonstrate the importance of establishing pro-competition rules in the concession of multiple airports to private companies by describing the recent Brazilian experience. More specifically, it addresses: (i) how the economic literature deals with potential competition among different airports, and how this competition was dealt with in the concession programs of Australia, Mexico and the United Kingdom; and (ii) Brazil's recent experience with airport concessions, where international benchmarking led to cross-ownership restrictions. As a conclusion, this paper defends that governments should design regulatory restrictions that account for the existence of competition among airports. Nevertheless, these restrictions must be carefully planned and designed to achieve their goals. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.relationJournal of air transport management
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectAirport privatization
dc.subjectCross-ownership restrictions
dc.subjectAirport competition
dc.subjectAuction rules
dc.titlePro-competition rules in airport privatization: international experience and the Brazilian case
dc.typeArticle (Journal/Review)


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución