dc.contributor | Escolas::EESP | |
dc.creator | Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-07T17:02:23Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-03T20:08:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-07T17:02:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-03T20:08:15Z | |
dc.date.created | 2015-08-07T17:02:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-08-07 | |
dc.identifier | TD 399 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10438/13882 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5032175 | |
dc.description.abstract | Brazil is growing around 1% per capita a year from 1981; this means for a country that is supposed to catch up, quasi-stagnation. Four historical new facts explain why growth was so low after the Real Plan: the reduction of public savings, and three facts that reduce private investments: the end of the unlimited supply of labor, a very high interest rate, and the 1990 dismantling of the mechanism that neutralized the Dutch disease, which represented a major competitive disadvantage for the manufacturing industry. New-developmental theory offers an explanation and two solutions for the problem, but does not underestimate the political economy problems involved. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | EESP - Textos para Discussão;TD 399 | |
dc.subject | Quasi-stagnation | |
dc.subject | Investment | |
dc.subject | Interest rate | |
dc.subject | Exchange rate | |
dc.subject | Dutch disease | |
dc.title | Brazil’s 35 years-old quasi-stagnation: facts and theory | |
dc.type | Working Paper | |