dc.contributorDemais unidades::RPCA
dc.contributorFGV
dc.creatorGuimarães, Bernardo de Vasconcellos
dc.creatorSheedy, Kevin D.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-24T13:23:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T19:49:09Z
dc.date.available2019-07-24T13:23:06Z
dc.date.available2022-11-03T19:49:09Z
dc.date.created2019-07-24T13:23:06Z
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10438/27735
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5029586
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a theory of institutional specialization in which some countries uphold the rule of law while others choose extractive institutions, even though they are ex-ante identical.This is borne out of two key insights: for incumbents in each country, (i) the first steps to the rule of law are more costly; and (ii) the rule of law is more attractive when other countries have extractive institutions. The world equilibrium features a symbiotic relationship between countries with opposite institutions. Using the transition from sail to steam-powered vessels in the nineteenth century, we find empirical evidence consistent with the model.
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectRule of law
dc.subjectPower sharing
dc.subjectInternational trade
dc.subjectExtractive institutions
dc.subjectResource curse
dc.subjectDevelopment
dc.titleInstitutional specialization
dc.typePaper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución