dc.contributor | Demais unidades::RPCA | |
dc.contributor | FGV | |
dc.creator | Guimarães, Bernardo de Vasconcellos | |
dc.creator | Sheedy, Kevin D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-24T13:23:06Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-03T19:49:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-24T13:23:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-03T19:49:09Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-07-24T13:23:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01 | |
dc.identifier | https://hdl.handle.net/10438/27735 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5029586 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a theory of institutional specialization in which some countries uphold the rule of law while others choose extractive institutions, even though they are ex-ante identical.This is borne out of two key insights: for incumbents in each country, (i) the first steps to the rule of law are more costly; and (ii) the rule of law is more attractive when other countries have extractive institutions. The world equilibrium features a symbiotic relationship between countries with opposite institutions. Using the transition from sail to steam-powered vessels in the nineteenth century, we find empirical evidence consistent with the model. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.subject | Rule of law | |
dc.subject | Power sharing | |
dc.subject | International trade | |
dc.subject | Extractive institutions | |
dc.subject | Resource curse | |
dc.subject | Development | |
dc.title | Institutional specialization | |
dc.type | Paper | |