dc.contributorEscolas::EESP
dc.creatorGuimaraes, Bernardo
dc.creatorSalama, Bruno Meyerhof
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-05T19:43:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T19:44:25Z
dc.date.available2021-07-05T19:43:49Z
dc.date.available2022-11-03T19:44:25Z
dc.date.created2021-07-05T19:43:49Z
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10438/30807
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/5028898
dc.description.abstractWe propose a model where the probability that courts will enforce a statute is endogenous to the statute itself. We obtain, Örst, that the enactment of legislation prohibiting something might raise the probability that courts will allow related things not expressly forbidden. We call that a ëpermitting prohibitioníand discuss examples that are consistent with the model. Second, we obtain that dispersion of court decisions might be greater with legislation that commands little court deference, than with legislation that commands none. Thus, within a certain range, legislation improvement might trade-o§ with court predictability
dc.languageeng
dc.relationTextos para Discussão / Working Paper Series;TD 544
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectAdjudication
dc.subjectCourts
dc.subjectProhibitions
dc.subjectLegal uncertainty
dc.titlePermitting prohibitions
dc.typeWorking Paper


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución