dc.creatorMontes de Oca, Maria
dc.creatorAguirre, Carlos
dc.creatorLopez Varela, Maria Victorina
dc.creatorLaucho Contreras, Maria Eugenia
dc.creatorCasas, Alejandro
dc.creatorSurmont, Filip
dc.date2018-02-22T15:19:23Z
dc.date2018-02-22T15:19:23Z
dc.date2016-12-07
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T01:30:29Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T01:30:29Z
dc.identifierMontes de Oca et al, Exacerbations and health care resource utilization in patients with airflow limitation diseases attending a primary care setting: the PUMA study.Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Dec 7;11:3059-306
dc.identifier1178-2005
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10872/17832
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4951325
dc.descriptionBackground: COPD, asthma, and asthma–COPD overlap increase health care resource consumption, predominantly because of hospitalization for exacerbations and also increased visits to general practitioners (GPs) or specialists. Little information is available regarding this in the primary care setting. Objectives: To describe the prevalence and number of GP and specialist visits for any cause or due to exacerbations in patients with COPD, asthma, and asthma–COPD overlap. Methods: COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second/ forced vital capacity (FEV 1 /FVC) ratio , 0.70; asthma was defined as prior medical diagnosis, wheezing in the last 12 months, or wheezing plus reversibility (post-bronchodilator FEV 1 or FVC increase $ 200 mL and $ 12%); asthma–COPD overlap was defined as post-bronchodilator FEV 1 /FVC , 0.70 plus prior asthma diagnosis. Health care utilization was evaluated as GP and/or specialist visits in the previous year. Results: Among the 1,743 individuals who completed the questionnaire, 1,540 performed acceptable spirometry. COPD patients had a higher prevalence of any medical visits to any physician versus those without COPD (37.2% vs 21.8%, respectively) and exacerbations doubled the number of visits. The prevalence of any medical visits to any physician was also higher in asthma patients versus those without asthma (wheezing: 47.2% vs 22.7%; medical diagnosis: 54.6% vs 21.6%; wheezing plus reversibility: 46.2% vs 23.8%, respectively). Asthma patients with exacerbations had twice the number of visits versus those without an exacerbation. The number of visits was higher (2.8 times) in asthma–COPD overlap, asthma (1.9 times), or COPD (1.4 times) patients versus those without these respiratory diseases; the number of visits due to exacerbation was also higher (4.9 times) in asthma–COPD overlap, asthma (3.5 times), and COPD (3.8 times) patients. Conclusion: COPD, asthma, and asthma–COPD overlap increase the prevalence of medical visits and, therefore, health care resource utilization. Attempts to reduce health care resource use in these patients require interventions aimed at preventing exacerbations.
dc.descriptionAstraZeneca Latin America.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Journal of COPD
dc.subjectCOPD
dc.subjectasthma
dc.subjectEPOC
dc.subjectexacerbations
dc.subjecthealth care resource utilization
dc.subjectprimary care
dc.subjectPUMA study
dc.subjectAtencion Primaria
dc.titleexacerbations and health care resource utilization in patients with airflow limitation diseases attending a primary care setting: the PUMA study
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución