dc.creatorChen, Nian
dc.creatorPratt, Warren
dc.creatorMao, Jingwen
dc.creatorXie, Guiqing
dc.creatorMoisy, Michel
dc.creatorSantos Polo, Alan Humberto
dc.creatorGuo, Weimin
dc.creatorZheng, Wei
dc.creatorLiu, Junan
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-07T20:50:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T15:36:31Z
dc.date.available2022-07-07T20:50:43Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T15:36:31Z
dc.date.created2022-07-07T20:50:43Z
dc.date.issued2022-08
dc.identifierChen, N., Pratt, W., Mao, J., Xie, G., Moisy, M., Santos, A., Guo, W., Zheng, W., & Liu, J. (2022). Geology and Geochronology of the Miocene Rio Blanco Porphyry Cu-Mo Deposit, Northern Peru. Economic Geology, 117(5), 1013-1042. https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.4896
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12544/3981
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.4896
dc.identifierEconomic Geology
dc.identifierEconomic Geology, vol.117, n.5, agosto 2022.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4906151
dc.description.abstractThe Rio Blanco porphyry Cu-Mo deposit occurs at the north end of the Miocene metallogenic belt of northern Peru. It has a thick supergene enrichment blanket; while normal for hyperarid Chile, this is unusual in mountainous, cloud forest terrain. Rio Blanco is hosted by the Portachuela batholith. Zircon U-Pb dating shows that the youngest part of the batholith was emplaced at 12.43 ± 0.13 Ma. The deposit formed during three magmatic-hydrothermal cycles. Cycle 1, by far the most important, occurred at 11.50 ± 0.17 to 10.92 ± 0.14 Ma (zircon U-Pb). Two intermineralization intrusions caused early potassic and propylitic alteration. This was then overprinted by a blanket of quartz-sericite, grading down into sericite-chlorite alteration. Cycle 1 was finally cut by a quartz-sericite–cemented breccia, which contains the highest-grade hypogene Cu-Mo grades. A cycle 1 molybdenite-bearing vein has a molybdenite Re-Os model age of 11.43 ± 0.16 Ma. Molybdenite Re-Os dating of the quartz-sericite–cemented breccias shows brecciation occurred at 11.28 ± 0.24 to 11.11 ± 0.18 Ma. Cycle 2 was restricted to the east side, where narrow porphyritic dacite 1 dikes (dated by zircon U-Pb at 10.62 ± 0.16 Ma) show biotite alteration and economic copper. Cycle 3, at 10.02 ± 0.12 to 9.06 ± 0.09 Ma (zircon U-Pb), was triggered by a swarm of NE-striking quartz-plagioclase porphyry and porphyritic dacite 2 dikes. Alteration was milder, and this cycle did not introduce economic copper. Nonmineralized pebble dikes cut the system, emanating from a major diatreme, about 3 × 1.3 km in size, on the north side of the deposit. The magmatic-hydrothermal history spanned about 2.5 m.y., with economic mineralization over about 1.48 m.y. However, metals were mostly introduced during cycle 1, which lasted approximately 0.58 m.y. Our work shows that while multiple magmatic-hydrothermal cycles produced Rio Blanco, sufficient metals were introduced to form a giant porphyry deposit within a single magmatic-hydrothermal cycle.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSociety of Economic Geologists
dc.publisherUS
dc.relationuri:issn:1554-0774
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional INGEMMET
dc.sourceInstituto Geológico, Minero y Metalúrgico – INGEMMET
dc.source1013
dc.source1042
dc.subjectGeología
dc.subjectGeocronología
dc.subjectYacimientos porfiríticos
dc.subjectCobre porfirítico
dc.subjectMineralización
dc.subjectAlteración hidrotermal
dc.subjectDatación U-Pb
dc.titleGeology and Geochronology of the Miocene Rio Blanco Porphyry Cu-Mo Deposit, Northern Peru
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución