dc.date.accessioned2022-08-15T20:11:08Z
dc.date.available2022-08-15T20:11:08Z
dc.date.created2022-08-15T20:11:08Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/12024
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10054
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Household air pollution (HAP) from biomass fuel combustion remains a leading environmental risk factor for morbidity worldwide. OBJECTIVE: Measure the effect of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) interventions on HAP exposures in Puno, Peru. METHODS: We conducted a 1-y randomized controlled trial followed by a 1-y pragmatic crossover trial in 180 women age 25-64 y. During the first year, intervention participants received a free LPG stove, continuous fuel delivery, and regular behavioral messaging, whereas controls continued their biomass cooking practices. During the second year, control participants received a free LPG stove, regular behavioral messaging, and vouchers to obtain LPG tanks from a nearby distributor, whereas fuel distribution stopped for intervention participants. We collected 48-h kitchen area concentrations and personal exposures to fine particulate matter (PM) with aerodynamic diameter formula presented (formula presented ), black carbon (BC), and carbon monoxide (CO) at baseline and 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-months post randomization. RESULTS: Baseline formula presented (kitchen area concentrations formula presented vs. formula presented ; personal exposure formula presented vs. formula presented ), CO (kitchen formula presented vs. formula presented ; personal formula presented vs. formula presented ), and BC (kitchen formula presented vs. formula presented ; personal formula presented vs. formula presented ) were similar between control and intervention participants. Intervention participants had consistently lower formula presented concentrations at the 12-month visit for kitchen (formula presented , and formula presented ) and personal exposures (formula presented , and formula presented ) to formula presented , BC, and CO when compared to controls during the first year. In the second year, we observed comparable HAP reductions among controls after the voucher-based intervention for LPG fuel was implemented (24-month visit formula presented , BC, and CO kitchen mean concentrations of formula presented , and formula presented and personal exposures of formula presented , and formula presented , respectively), and average reductions were present among intervention participants even after free fuel distribution stopped (24-month visit formula presented , BC, and CO kitchen mean concentrations of formula presented , and formula presented and personal exposures of formula presented , and formula presented , respectively). DISCUSSION: Both home delivery and voucher-based provision of free LPG over a 1-y period, in combination with provision of a free LPG stove and longitudinal behavioral messaging, reduced HAP to levels below 24-h World Health Organization air quality guidelines. Moreover, the effects of the intervention on HAP persisted for a year after fuel delivery stopped. Such strategies could be applied in LPG programs to reduce HAP and potentially improve health.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
dc.relationEnvironmental Health Perspectives
dc.relation1552-9924
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectHousehold Air Pollution
dc.subjectLiquefied Petroleum Gas
dc.subjectRural Peru
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.subjectPragmatic Crossover Trial
dc.titleHousehold Air Pollution Concentrations after Liquefied Petroleum Gas Interventions in Rural Peru: Findings from a One-Year Randomized Controlled Trial Followed by a One-Year Pragmatic Crossover Trial
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución