dc.date.accessioned2022-01-04T20:31:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T18:47:55Z
dc.date.available2022-01-04T20:31:43Z
dc.date.available2022-10-25T18:47:55Z
dc.date.created2022-01-04T20:31:43Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/10555
dc.identifierJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-202661
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4785046
dc.description.abstractObjectives: High rates of household participation are critical to the success of door-to-door vector control campaigns. We used the Health Belief Model to assess determinants of participation, including neighbour participation as a cue to action, in a Chagas disease vector control campaign in Peru. Methods: We evaluated clustering of participation among neighbours; estimated participation as a function of household infestation status, neighbourhood type and number of participating neighbours; and described the reported reasons for refusal to participate in a district of 2911 households. Results We observed significant clustering of participation along city blocks (p<0.0001). Participation was significantly higher for households in new versus established neighbourhoods, for infested households, and for households with more participating neighbours. The effect of neighbour participation was greater in new neighbourhoods. Conclusions Results support a ‘contagion’ model of participation, highlighting the possibility that one or two participating households can tip a block towards full participation. Future campaigns can leverage these findings by making participation more visible, by addressing stigma associated with spraying, and by employing group incentives to spray.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relationurn:issn:1470-2738
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectPeru
dc.subjectisolation and purification
dc.subjectChagas disease
dc.subjecthealth promotion
dc.subjectinsect control
dc.subjectTrypanosoma cruzi
dc.subjectepidemiology
dc.subjecttropical medicine
dc.subjectdemography
dc.subjectPoverty Areas
dc.subjectResidence Characteristics
dc.subjecturban population
dc.subjectUrban Population
dc.subjectinfection control
dc.subjectstatistical model
dc.subjecteconomics
dc.subjecthuman relation
dc.subjectInterpersonal Relations
dc.subjectdisease transmission
dc.subjectclassification
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectLogistic Models
dc.subjectconsumer
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectstatistics
dc.subjectcommunicable disease
dc.subjectConsumer Participation
dc.subjectCommunicable Disease Control
dc.subjectCommunicable Diseases
dc.subjectControl of DIseases
dc.subjectDeveloping Countr
dc.subjectDEVELOPING COUNTR
dc.subjectrefusal to participate
dc.subjectRefusal to Participate
dc.subjectTropical Health
dc.subjectTropical Medicine
dc.titleIs participation contagious? Evidence from a household vector control campaign in urban Peru
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución