dc.date.accessioned2022-01-04T20:30:00Z
dc.date.available2022-01-04T20:30:00Z
dc.date.created2022-01-04T20:30:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/10513
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-014-0024-5
dc.description.abstractBackground: Emergency Medicine (EM) is increasingly becoming an international field. The number of fellowships in International EM in the USA is growing along with opportunities to complete international health electives (IHEs) during residency training. The impact on host institutions, however, has not been adequately investigated. The Objetive: of this study is to assess the experience of several South American hospitals hosting foreign EM residents completing IHEs. Methods: Anonymous, semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted with physicians working in Emergency Departments in three hospitals in Lima, Peru and one hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. All participants reported previously working with EM foreign rotators. Interviews were analyzed qualitatively and coded for common themes. Results: Three department chairs, six residents, and 15 attending physicians were interviewed (total = 24). After qualitative analysis of interviews, two broad theme categories emerged: Benefits and challenges. Most commonly reported benefits were knowledge sharing about emergency medical systems (78%), medical knowledge transfer (58%), and long-term relationship formation (42%). Top challenges included rotator Spanish language proficiency (70%) lack of reciprocity (58%), and level of training and rotation length (25%). Spanish proficiency related directly to how involved rotators became in patient care (e.g., taking a history, participating in rounds) but was not completely prohibitive, as a majority of physicians interviewed felt comfortable speaking in English. Lack of reciprocity refers to the difficulty of sending host physicians abroad as well as failed attempts at building long-lasting relationships with foreign institutions. Lastly, 25% preferred rotators to stay for at least 1 month and rotate in the last year of EM residency. This latter preference increased knowledge transfer from rotator to host. Conclusions: Our research identified benefits and challenges of IHEs in Emergency Medicine from the perspective of physician hosts in several hospitals in South America. Our results suggest that IHEs function best when EM residents rotate later in residency training and when relationships are maintained and deepened among those involved including host physicians, rotators, and institutions. This leads to future rotators, project collaboration, research, and publications which not only benefit individuals involved but also the wider field of Emergency Medicine.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationInternational Journal of Emergency Medicine
dc.relation1865-1380
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectPeru
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectArgentina
dc.subjectclinical competence
dc.subjectclinical supervision
dc.subjectemergency medicine
dc.subjectforeign student
dc.subjectGlobal health
dc.subjectinternational cooperation
dc.subjectInternational Emergency Medicine
dc.subjectInternational Health Elective
dc.subjectlearning
dc.subjectphysician attitude
dc.subjectqualitative research
dc.subjectresidency education
dc.subjectResidency education
dc.subjectSouth American
dc.titlePerspectives of South American physicians hosting foreign rotators in emergency medicine
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución