dc.date.accessioned2022-01-04T20:29:58Z
dc.date.available2022-01-04T20:29:58Z
dc.date.created2022-01-04T20:29:58Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/10479
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2013.861859
dc.description.abstractPeru has applied to six of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (the Global Fund) rounds for funding, achieving success on four occasions. The process of proposal development has, however, been criticised, especially concerning the use of evidence, relevance/consistency and performance indicators. We aimed to analyse the Peruvian Global Fund proposals according to those dimensions, providing feedback to improve future local efforts and inform global discussions around Global Fund procedures. We analysed the content of four HIV-focused proposals (rounds 2, 5, 6 and 8) regarding epidemic context, needs identification and prioritisation and monitoring and evaluation systems. Peruvian proposals submitted after round 1 were described as resulting from collaborative inputs involving formerly unrepresented sectors, principally ‘vulnerable populations’. However, difficulties arose regarding the amount and quality of evidence about the epidemiological context; limited consideration of social determinants of the epidemic; lack of theory-driven interventions, and little synergy across projects and the inclusion of weak monitoring and evaluation systems, with poor indicators and measurement procedures. Prioritising the development of analytical and technical skills to generate Global Fund proposals would enhance the country's capacity to produce and utilise evidence, improve the technical-political interface, strengthen information systems and lead to more informed decision making and accountability.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis
dc.relationGlobal Public Health
dc.relation1744-1706
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectHIV
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectPeru
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectHealth Promotion
dc.subjectHIV Infections
dc.subjectHuman immunodeficiency virus infection
dc.subjectsexual education
dc.subjectpregnant woman
dc.subjecthigh risk population
dc.subjectfunding
dc.subjectepidemic
dc.subjecthealth care planning
dc.subjecthealth program
dc.subjecthealth care policy
dc.subjectpopulation size
dc.subjectGlobal Fund
dc.subjectInternational Cooperation
dc.subjectPolicy Making
dc.subjectpopulation
dc.subjectmen who have sex with men
dc.subjectHuman immunodeficiency virus prevalence
dc.subjectprisoner
dc.subjectprostitution
dc.subjectvulnerable population
dc.subjectNeeds Assessment
dc.subjectCapacity Building
dc.subjectcontent analysis
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Medicine
dc.subjectfeedback system
dc.subjectFinancing, Organized
dc.subjecthealth policy
dc.subjectHealth Policy
dc.subjectHIV education
dc.subjectMedical Informatics
dc.subjectPolitics
dc.subjectproposal analysis
dc.subjectRisk Reduction Behavior
dc.subjectsentinel surveillance
dc.subjectSex Education
dc.subjectsexual practice
dc.subjectSocial Stigma
dc.subjectVulnerable Populations
dc.titleA critical analysis of Peru's HIV grant proposals to the Global Fund
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución