dc.date.accessioned2021-12-12T20:24:53Z
dc.date.available2021-12-12T20:24:53Z
dc.date.created2021-12-12T20:24:53Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/10197
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03456-z
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study has two aims. First, determine the fit of the fear model to COVID-19, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress in the general population and health-care workers. Second, determine which model best explains the relationship between depression and the triad of fear, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress in both groups. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted using self-reported questionnaires for anxiety, fear of COVID-19, depression, and post-traumatic stress. Information was collected from adults living in Lima, the capital and the most populous city in Peru. The explanatory models were evaluated using a structural equation model. Results: A total of 830 participants were included, including general population (n = 640) and health-care workers (n = 190). A high overall prevalence of depressive symptoms (16%), anxiety (11.7%), and post-traumatic stress (14.9%) were identified. A higher prevalence of depressive, anxious, or stress symptoms was identified in the general population (28.6%) compared to health-care workers (17.9%). The triad model of fear of COVID-19, anxiety, and stress presented adequate goodness-of-fit indices for both groups. A model was identified that manages to explain depressive symptoms in more than 70% of the general population and health-care workers, based on the variables of the triad (CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.06; SRMR = 0.06). In the general population post-traumatic stress mediated the relationship between anxiety and depression (β = 0.12; 95%CI = 0.06 to 0.18) which was significant, but the indirect effect of post-traumatic stress was not significant in health care workers (β = 0.03; 95%CI = − 0.11 to 0.19). Limitations: The prevalence estimates relied on self-reported information. Other variables of interest, such as intolerance to uncertainty or income level, could not be evaluated. Conclusions: Our study proposes and tests one model that explains more than 70% of depressive symptoms. This explanatory model can be used in health contexts and populations to determine how emotional factors can affect depressive symptoms
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relationBMC Psychiatry
dc.relation1471-244X
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectanxiety
dc.subjectAnxiety
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjectdepression
dc.subjectDepression
dc.subjectfear
dc.subjectFear
dc.subjectFear of COVID-19
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPeru
dc.subjectPost-traumatic stress
dc.subjectposttraumatic stress disorder
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2
dc.subjectStress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
dc.titleDepression, post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and fear of COVID-19 in the general population and health-care workers: prevalence, relationship, and explicative model in Peru
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución