dc.date.accessioned2019-01-25T16:20:58Z
dc.date.available2019-01-25T16:20:58Z
dc.date.created2019-01-25T16:20:58Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/4819
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1304-4
dc.description.abstractBackground: The PTSD Checklist-civilian (PCL-C) is one of the most commonly used self-report measures of PTSD symptoms, however, little is known about its validity when used in pregnancy. This study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the PCL-C as a screen for detecting PTSD symptoms among pregnant women. Methods: A total of 3372 pregnant women who attended their first prenatal care visit in Lima, Peru participated in the study. We assessed the reliability of the PCL-C items using Cronbach's alpha. Criterion validity and performance characteristics of PCL-C were assessed against an independent, blinded Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) interview using measures of sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. We tested construct validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic approaches. Results: The reliability of the PCL-C was excellent (Cronbach's alpha =0.90). ROC analysis showed that a cut-off score of 26 offered optimal discriminatory power, with a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.92) and a specificity of 0. 63 (95% CI: 0.62-0.65). The area under the ROC curve was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78). A three-factor solution was extracted using exploratory factor analysis and was further complemented with three other models using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In a CFA, a three-factor model based on DSM-IV symptom structure had reasonable fit statistics with comparative fit index of 0.86 and root mean square error of approximation of 0.09. Conclusion: The Spanish-language version of the PCL-C may be used as a screening tool for pregnant women. The PCL-C has good reliability, criterion validity and factorial validity. The optimal cut-off score obtained by maximizing the sensitivity and specificity should be considered cautiously; women who screened positive may require further investigation to confirm PTSD diagnosis.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relationBMC Psychiatry
dc.relation1471-244X
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectPeru
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectprimary-care
dc.subjectcivilian version
dc.subjectconfirmatory factor-analysis
dc.subjectdomestic violence
dc.subjectexploratory factor-analysis
dc.subjectintimate partner violence
dc.subjectpatients
dc.subjectPCL-C
dc.subjectPost-traumatic stress disorder
dc.subjectpreterm birth
dc.subjectpsychometric properties
dc.subjectsevere mental-illness
dc.subjectversion pcl-c
dc.titleValidity of the posttraumatic stress disorders (PTSD) checklist in pregnant women
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución