dc.creatorVerstraeten, Roosmarijn
dc.creatorLachat, Carl
dc.creatorOchoa Aviles, Angelica Maria
dc.creatorHagstromer, Maria
dc.creatorHuybregts, Lieven Fernand
dc.creatorAndrade Tenesaca, Dolores Susana
dc.creatorDonoso Moscoso, Silvana Patricia
dc.creatorVan Camp, John
dc.creatorMaes, Lea
dc.creatorKolsteren, Patrick
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-11T21:21:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-21T01:00:56Z
dc.date.available2018-01-11T21:21:50Z
dc.date.available2022-10-21T01:00:56Z
dc.date.created2018-01-11T21:21:50Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier1471-2458
dc.identifierhttps://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1109
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4628281
dc.description.abstractBackground: Poor to moderate validity of self-reported physical activity instruments is commonly observed in young people in low- and middle-income countries. However, the reasons for such low validity have not been examined in detail. We tested the validity of a self-administered daily physical activity record in adolescents and assessed if personal characteristics or the convenience level of reporting physical activity modified the validity estimates. Methods: The study comprised a total of 302 adolescents from an urban and rural area in Ecuador. Validity was evaluated by comparing the record with accelerometer recordings for seven consecutive days. Test-retest reliability was examined by comparing registrations from two records administered three weeks apart. Time spent on sedentary (SED), low (LPA), moderate (MPA) and vigorous (VPA) intensity physical activity was estimated. Bland Altman plots were used to evaluate measurement agreement. We assessed if age, sex, urban or rural setting, anthropometry and convenience of completing the record explained differences in validity estimates using a linear mixed model. Results: Although the record provided higher estimates for SED and VPA and lower estimates for LPA and MPA compared to the accelerometer, it showed an overall fair measurement agreement for validity. There was modest reliability for assessing physical activity in each intensity level. Validity was associated with adolescents’ personal characteristics: sex (SED: P = 0.007; LPA: P = 0.001; VPA: P = 0.009) and setting (LPA: P = 0.000; MPA: P = 0.047). Reliability was associated with the convenience of completing the physical activity record for LPA (low convenience: P = 0.014; high convenience: P = 0.045). Conclusions: The physical activity record provided acceptable estimates for reliability and validity on a group level. Sex and setting were associated with validity estimates, whereas convenience to fill out the record was associated with better reliability estimates for LPA. This tendency of improved reliability estimates for adolescents reporting higher convenience merits further consideration.
dc.languagees_ES
dc.sourceBMC Public Health
dc.subjectAccelerometers
dc.subjectConvenience
dc.subjectDiary
dc.subjectEcuador
dc.subjectLow and middle income countries
dc.subjectValidity
dc.titlePredictors of validity and reliability of a physical activity record in adolescents
dc.typeARTÍCULO


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución