dc.creatorHo, Long
dc.creatorJerves Cobo, Ruben Fernando
dc.creatorMorales Matute, Oscar Patricio
dc.creatorLarriva Vasquez, Josue Bernardo
dc.creatorArevalo Durazno, Maria Belen
dc.creatorBarthel, Matti
dc.creatorSix, Johan
dc.creatorBode, Samuel
dc.creatorBoeckx, Pascal
dc.creatorGoethals, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-19T17:31:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T21:41:51Z
dc.date.available2021-05-19T17:31:56Z
dc.date.available2022-10-20T21:41:51Z
dc.date.created2021-05-19T17:31:56Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier00431354, 18792448
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135421000567
dc.identifier10.1016/j.watres.2021.116858
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4605169
dc.description.abstractDue to regular influx of organic matter and nutrients, waste stabilization ponds (WSPs) can release considerable quantities of greenhouse gases (GHGs). To investigate the spatiotemporal variations of GHG emissions from WSPs with a focus on the effects of sludge accumulation and distribution, we conducted a bathymetry survey and two sampling campaigns in Ucubamba WSP (Cuenca, Ecuador). The results indicated that spatial variation of GHG emissions was strongly dependent on sludge distribution. Thick sludge layers in aerated ponds and facultative ponds caused substantial CO 2 and CH 4 emissions which accounted for 21.3% and 78.7% of the total emissions from the plant. Conversely, the prevalence of anoxic conditions stimulated the N 2 O consumption via complete denitrification leading to a net uptake from the atmosphere, i.e. up to 1.4 ±0.2 mg-N m −2 d −1 . Double emission rates of CO 2 were found in the facultative and maturation ponds during the day compared to night-time emissions, indicating the important role of algal respiration, while no diel variation of the CH 4 and N 2 O emissions was found. Despite the uptake of N 2 O, the total GHG emissions of the WSP was higher than constructed wetlands and conventional cen- tralized wastewater treatment facilities. Hence, it is recommended that sludge management with proper desludging regulation should be included as an important mitigation measure to reduce the carbon foot- print of pond treatment facilities.
dc.languagees_ES
dc.sourceWater Research
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas
dc.subjectStabilization pond
dc.subjectCarbon dioxide
dc.subjectMethane
dc.subjectNitrous oxide
dc.subjectSludge
dc.subjectSpatiotemporal variation
dc.titleSpatial and temporal variations of greenhouse gas emissions from a waste stabilization pond: effects of sludge distribution and accumulation
dc.typeARTÍCULO


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución