dc.creatorValdivieso Vintimilla, Simon Bolivar
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-12T15:59:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T20:13:44Z
dc.date.available2021-03-12T15:59:38Z
dc.date.available2022-10-20T20:13:44Z
dc.date.created2021-03-12T15:59:38Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier2602-8425
dc.identifierhttps://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/iuris/article/view/2200
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4595080
dc.description.abstractThe qualification of the complaint as malicious when the Prosecutor has requested to file a case is a legislative excess. This is because when the Ecuadorian legislator sanctions the malicious attitude of the complainant or the private accuser is referring to the false imputation of a crime. However, it does not sanction the conduct that threatens the right to honor, but the effective judicial protection. Therefore, it becomes a violation of the public exercise of the action. In an accusatory procedural system, the public exercise of the action is an exclusive attribution of the Prosecutor. So, while there is no formulation of charges, there is no affection to the right because the investigation is reserved.
dc.languagees_ES
dc.sourceRevista Iuris
dc.subjectDerecho penal
dc.subjectDenuncia maliciosa
dc.subjectDerecho al honor
dc.subjectProtección judicial efectiva
dc.titleLa acusación o denuncia maliciosa: ¿lesión al honor o a la tutela judicial efectiva?, de haber vulneración a un derecho, ¿debe responder la víctima?
dc.typeARTÍCULO


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución