| dc.description.abstract | The present work indicates the importance of looking for the adequate bibliography
that allows framing the anarchist, liberal and socialist currents in their historical
context, pointing out the evolution, where the various movements or doctrines that
have been formed around each of these currents are presented, the main authors,
the defenses and the criticisms that have been made. Both anarchism, liberalism
and socialism have an end, each end is different, the anarchist does not want to
live oppressed by what he wants to annihilate the State; the liberal, specifically the
classic, is going to reject the authoritarian laws of the State but does not want to
annihilate it, he only wants his actions to be minimal; and the socialist, seeks to
improve the quality of life of people, the State must give to each one according to
their needs, thus achieving equality in a cooperative society. From the aspects of
these currents, the place that freedom has in each one can be identified. For this,
several authors (the most important) of each current, in anarchism will be
consulted: Mijail Bakunin, Piotr Kropotkin and Murray Rothbard; in classical
liberalism to: Isaiah Berlin, John Locke and John Stuart Mill; and finally in socialism
to: Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Gerrard Winstanley. With all the information
collected on freedom in each stream, it is possible to determine which one
responds with greater explanatory capacity and logical coherence to the different
criteria (parameters) of adequacy established | |
