Estructuración filo y ontogenética de la cognición incorporada / Structure edge and ontogenetic of the built-in cognition
dc.creator | San Martín, Rómulo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-16T20:20:53Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-20T18:27:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-16T20:20:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-20T18:27:56Z | |
dc.date.created | 2015-04-16T20:20:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-06 | |
dc.identifier | http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/8765 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4577885 | |
dc.description.abstract | Embody cognition is antipresencialista and therefore does not succumb to the objectual externalism. Its nature is archeologica and teleological: with regard to the first, all know is chained to the development of the species, therefore does not understand from the single anthropological dimension. As for the second it is finished in behaviors, representations, objectifications-cosistas. Knowing is incorporated because it’s phylogenetic, then belonging to the species; but it is also ontogenetic, then belonging to the individua. The knowledge of the individual subject is one consequence of the species in a particular environment, therefore is ontogenetic. All new cognition articulating shaft is above all the neo, which is very sensitive to the periphery. | |
dc.language | es | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.subject | ONTOGÉNESIS | |
dc.subject | FILOGÉNESIS | |
dc.subject | GENES | |
dc.subject | PERIFERIA | |
dc.subject | AMBIENTE | |
dc.subject | NEOCORTEZA | |
dc.title | Estructuración filo y ontogenética de la cognición incorporada / Structure edge and ontogenetic of the built-in cognition | |
dc.type | Article |