dc.creatorOrmeño Karzulovic, Juan
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-08T21:34:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T17:56:02Z
dc.date.available2015-04-08T21:34:28Z
dc.date.available2022-10-20T17:56:02Z
dc.date.created2015-04-08T21:34:28Z
dc.date.issued2010-06-30
dc.identifierhttp://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/8128
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4564335
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I want to criticize the claim, familiar from some social-constructionist accounts, that “memory” be understood, largely or exclusively, as a “social discursive practice”. I want to defend the argument that, to be intelligible, and to be properly used in social psychology, the notion of me mory entails mental attitudes and the truth-conditions of language. Hence I plead for a wider understanding of whatit is involved in the concept of “social practice”
dc.languagees
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectMEMORIA
dc.subjectPRÁCTICA SOCIAL DISCURSIVA
dc.subjectACTITUDES MENTALES
dc.subjectCONDICIONES DE VERDAD
dc.subjectRACIONALIDAD
dc.subjectPSICOLOGÍA SOCIAL
dc.subjectSOCIOCONSTRUCCIONISMO
dc.subjectCONDUCTISMO ANALÍTICO
dc.subjectMATERIALISMO ELIMINATIVO
dc.subjectPRÁCTICA SOCIAL
dc.subjectNORMAS
dc.titleAlgunas cuestio nesteóricas relativas a la “memoria” como práctica social
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución