dc.creatorPacheco Solano, Katherine
dc.creatorBarrantes González, Alexander
dc.creatorDolz, Gaby
dc.creatorTroyo Rodríguez, Adriana
dc.creatorJiménez Rocha, Ana Eugenia
dc.creatorRomero Zúñiga, Juan José
dc.creatorTaylor Castillo, Mayra Lizeth
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-07T14:13:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T01:48:31Z
dc.date.available2020-02-07T14:13:47Z
dc.date.available2022-10-20T01:48:31Z
dc.date.created2020-02-07T14:13:47Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405673119300819
dc.identifier2405-6731
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10669/80500
dc.identifier10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00118
dc.identifier803-B1-653
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4542855
dc.description.abstractInfection of dogs with Rickettsia spp. can result in inapparent, mild, or severe disease. Moreover, common dog ticks and fleas are able to transmit rickettsiae to nearby humans. In this study, the seroprevalence of spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsiae was determined in dogs of Costa Rica, as well as possible risk factors associated with exposure. An interview of owners and clinical examinations were performed in a country-wide sample of 441 dogs. IgG antibodies were determined in 399 dogs by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using antigens of Rickettsia rickettsii, R. amblyommatis, and R. felis. The presence of Rickettsia spp. gltA gene was evaluated by PCR in ticks and fleas. Poisson regression was performed to assess possible risk factors associated with seropositivity, as well as with having PCR-positive ticks and fleas. The overall seroprevalence to SFG rickettsiae was 10.0% (end titers 64 to 256). Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. (116/441; 26.3%) and Ctenocephalides felis (153/441; 34.7%) were the most common ectoparasites. Rickettsia DNA was detected in 30% (39/130) and 32.3% (56/173) of tick and flea pools, respectively. Seropositivity was significantly associated with mean age of 2 to 7 years, scrotal edema, walking problems, large size, and tick and flea infestation. Being a purebred dog was a possible protective factor. The presence of Rickettsia PCR-positive ticks was associated with being a purebred dog, while flea treatment was protective. Having PCR-positive fleas was associated with being purebred and the number of people in the dog's environment; protective factors were free roaming and being an outdoor dog. Results confirm that dogs in Costa Rica are exposed to different species of SFG rickettsiae. This may represent a risk to human health and underscores the need for accurate diagnosis in dogs and humans. Surveillance of rickettsial infection in canines may provide useful indicators to understand the epidemiology of these zoonoses.
dc.languageen_US
dc.sourceParasite Epidemiology and Control, vol.7, pp.1-9
dc.subjectSeroprevalence
dc.subjectRickettsia
dc.subjectCanine
dc.subjectRisk factors
dc.subjectCosta Rica
dc.titleExposure of dogs to Rickettsia spp. in Costa Rica: Risk factors for PCR-positive ectoparasites and seropositivity
dc.typeartículo científico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución