| dc.creator | Budán, Paola D. | |
| dc.creator | Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David | |
| dc.creator | Simari, Guillermo Ricardo | |
| dc.date | 2012-10 | |
| dc.date | 2012-10 | |
| dc.date | 2012-11-05T13:18:37Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23615 | |
| dc.description | The research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, sci- enti c argumentation, and especially in AI. One type of argumentation scheme corresponds to appeal to Expert Opinion or Position-to-Know argumentation. Position-to-know reasoning is typically used in an infor- mation seeking type of dialogue where one has to depend on a source. Most of such argumentation frameworks are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In this work we introduce a novel framework, called Expert Argumentation Framework (EAF), extending AF with the capability of modeling the quality of expert associated with the arguments that proposed. | |
| dc.description | Eje: Workshop Agentes y sistemas inteligentes (WASI) | |
| dc.description | Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.relation | XVIII Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación | |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ | |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) | |
| dc.subject | Ciencias Informáticas | |
| dc.title | A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion | |
| dc.type | Objeto de conferencia | |
| dc.type | Objeto de conferencia | |
