dc.creatorHipólito de Sousa, Juliana
dc.creatorBlandina, Felipe Viana
dc.creatorGaribaldi, Lucas Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-12T18:42:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T16:40:59Z
dc.date.available2019-06-12T18:42:50Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T16:40:59Z
dc.date.created2019-06-12T18:42:50Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-12
dc.identifierHipólito de Sousa, Juliana; Blandina, Felipe Viana; Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro; The value of pollinator-friendly practices: Synergies between natural and anthropogenic assets; Elsevier Gmbh, Urban & Fischer Verlag; Basic and Applied Ecology; 17; 8; 12-12-2016; 659-667
dc.identifier1439-1791
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/78106
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4410530
dc.description.abstractSustainable livelihoods and human well-being depend on multiple anthropogenic and natural assets (stock of materials or information that exists in a point in time). However, the simultaneous and multiple impacts of land-use decisions on these assets are often ignored. In this study, we focus on pollinator-friendly practices (PFP: practices that intend to increase the abundance and diversity of natural pollinators) to quantify the multi-dimensional value of land-use decisions and to address potential synergies and trade-offs among assets. We combined socio-economic and ecological methods to quantify natural (pollinator richness) and anthropogenic (human, physical, social, and financial) assets in 30 coffee plantations with a gradient in the number of PFP in eastern Brazil. We found that an increase in the number of PFP resulted in both enhanced flower-visitor richness (natural asset) and coffee yield (financial asset). Farmers who dedicated more time to field work than to administrative work applied more PFP on their farms. Our results highlight that land-use decisions oriented toward enhancing natural assets can also provide the highest levels of financial assets. This provides a general framework for efforts toward ecological intensification that can be employed in other regions.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Gmbh, Urban & Fischer Verlag
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2016.09.003
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179116301499
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/5575489
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectCONSERVATION
dc.subjectCROP YIELD
dc.subjectPOLLINATOR-FRIENDLY PRACTICES
dc.subjectPOLLINATORS
dc.subjectSOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
dc.titleThe value of pollinator-friendly practices: Synergies between natural and anthropogenic assets
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución