dc.creatorRodriguez Granillo, Gaston Alfredo
dc.creatorCapunay, Carlos
dc.creatorDeviggiano, Alejandro
dc.creatorDe Zan, Macarena
dc.creatorCarrascosa, Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-28T18:05:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T16:10:38Z
dc.date.available2022-06-28T18:05:08Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T16:10:38Z
dc.date.created2022-06-28T18:05:08Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.identifierRodriguez Granillo, Gaston Alfredo; Capunay, Carlos; Deviggiano, Alejandro; De Zan, Macarena; Carrascosa, Patricia; Regional differences of fat depot attenuation using non-contrast, contrast-enhanced, and delayed-enhanced cardiac CT; SAGE Publications; Acta Radiologica; 60; 4; 4-2019; 459-467
dc.identifier0284-1851
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/160676
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4407316
dc.description.abstractBackground: Regional fat density assessed by computed tomography (CT) has been suggested as a marker of perivascular adipose tissue inflammation. Dual energy CT (DECT) allows improved tissue characterization compared to conventional CT. Purpose: To explore whether DECT might aid regional fat density discrimination. Material and Methods: We included patients who had completed a non-enhanced cardiac CT scan, CT coronary angiography (CTCA), and a delayed enhancement CT. Attenuation levels (Hounsfield units [HU]) were assessed at the epicardial, paracardial, visceral, and subcutaneous fat. The number of coronary segments with disease (SIS) was calculated. Results: A total of 36 patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-six (72%) patients had evidence of obstructive disease at CCTA and 25 (69%) patients had evidence of previous myocardial infarction. At non-contrast CT, we did not identify significant attenuation differences between epicardial, paracardial, subcutaneous, and visceral fat depots (−110.8 ± 9 HU, vs. −113.7 ± 9 HU, vs. −114.7 ± 8 HU, vs. −113.8 ± 11 HU, P = 0.36). Significant attenuation differences were detected between fat depots at mid and low energy levels, both at CTCA and delayed-enhancement scans (P < 0.05 for all). Epicardial fat showed the least negative attenuation, irrespective of the acquisition mode; epicardial fat evaluated at 40 keV was related to the SIS (r = 0.37, P = 0.03). Conclusions: In this study, regional fat depots amenable to examination during thoracic CT scans have distinctive regional attenuation values. Furthermore, such differences were better displayed using contrast-enhanced monochromatic imaging at low energy levels.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0284185118787356
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0284185118787356
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectADIPOSE TISSUE
dc.subjectARTERIOSCLEROSIS
dc.subjectCARDIAC
dc.subjectCT ANGIOGRAPHY
dc.subjectINFLAMMATION
dc.subjectTISSUE CHARACTERIZATION
dc.titleRegional differences of fat depot attenuation using non-contrast, contrast-enhanced, and delayed-enhanced cardiac CT
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución