dc.creatorOrlando, Eleonora Eva
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-04T18:04:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T16:05:31Z
dc.date.available2022-10-04T18:04:41Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T16:05:31Z
dc.date.created2022-10-04T18:04:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.identifierOrlando, Eleonora Eva; Mental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey; University of Presov. Faculty of Arts; Espes; 10; 1; 4-2021; 79-88
dc.identifier1339-1119
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/171800
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4406771
dc.description.abstractIn this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put forward in Orlando (2017). The main tenet of that proposal is that fictional names refer to individual concepts, which I understand in terms of mental files. In Vecsey (2020), the author presents three main objections: (i) no referential shift can be ascribed to fictional names, (ii) fictional names are supposed to play two conflicting functions, and (iii) the mental file framework is incompatible with an antirealist view of fictional objects. Although the objections are deep and thoughtful, the challenge they involve can be met if certain aspects of the proposal are clarified and developed.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversity of Presov. Faculty of Arts
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://espes.ff.unipo.sk/index.php/ESPES/article/view/210
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectANTIREALISM VS. REALISM ABOUT FICTION
dc.subjectFICTIONAL CONCEPT
dc.subjectFICTIONAL NAME
dc.subjectFICTIONAL NARRATIVE
dc.subjectMENTAL FILE
dc.titleMental Files and the Theory of Fiction: A Reply to Zoltán Vecsey
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución