dc.creatorPiccardi, Mónica Belén
dc.creatorMacchiavelli, Raúl
dc.creatorFunes, Ariel Capitaine
dc.creatorBó, Gabriel A.
dc.creatorBalzarini, Monica Graciela
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-12T20:16:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T15:02:32Z
dc.date.available2020-02-12T20:16:31Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T15:02:32Z
dc.date.created2020-02-12T20:16:31Z
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.identifierPiccardi, Mónica Belén; Macchiavelli, Raúl; Funes, Ariel Capitaine; Bó, Gabriel A.; Balzarini, Monica Graciela; Fitting milk production curves through nonlinear mixed models; Cambridge University Press; Journal of Dairy Research; 84; 2; 5-2017; 146-153
dc.identifier0022-0299
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/97338
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4400100
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this work was to fit and compare three non-linear models (Wood, Milkbot and diphasic) to model lactation curves from two approaches: with and without cow random effect. Knowing the behaviour of lactation curves is critical for decision-making in a dairy farm. Knowledge of the model of milk production progress along each lactation is necessary not only at the mean population level (dairy farm), but also at individual level (cow-lactation). The fits were made in a group of high production and reproduction dairy farms; in first and third lactations in cool seasons. A total of 2167 complete lactations were involved, of which 984 were first-lactations and the remaining ones, third lactations (19 382 milk yield tests). PROC NLMIXED in SAS was used to make the fits and estimate the model parameters. The diphasic model resulted to be computationally complex and barely practical. Regarding the classical Wood and MilkBot models, although the information criteria suggest the selection of MilkBot, the differences in the estimation of production indicators did not show a significant improvement. The Wood model was found to be a good option for fitting the expected value of lactation curves. Furthermore, the three models fitted better when the subject (cow) random effect was considered, which is related to magnitude of production. The random effect improved the predictive potential of the models, but it did not have a significant effect on the production indicators derived from the lactation curves, such as milk yield and days in milk to peak.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022029917000085
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-dairy-research/article/fitting-milk-production-curves-through-nonlinear-mixed-models/77F777E343DA0569EE3C9DA66C55B951
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectCOMPARISON CRITERIA
dc.subjectESTIMATION
dc.subjectLACTATION CURVES
dc.subjectRANDOM EFFECT
dc.titleFitting milk production curves through nonlinear mixed models
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución