dc.creatorMarey, Macarena
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-30T20:26:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T14:17:33Z
dc.date.available2019-05-30T20:26:36Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T14:17:33Z
dc.date.created2019-05-30T20:26:36Z
dc.date.issued2017-04
dc.identifierMarey, Macarena; A Political Defence of Kant’s Aufklärung: An Essay; Taylor & Francis Ltd; Critical Horizons; 18; 2; 4-2017; 168-185
dc.identifier1440-9917
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/77408
dc.identifier1568-5160
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4395898
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this essay is to analyse the potential for political emancipation that lies within Kant’s conception of Aufklärung, in critical dialogue with enlightenment critics and specialised Kantian literature. My thesis is that Kant’s concept of enlightenment is intrinsically political and so it must be studied from the point of view of his political philosophy, which was fully developed in the decade of the 1790s. From this standpoint, I propose we study the role and place of Aufklärung within Kant’s central political thesis, to wit: that only the united will of the people can be a legitimate authority.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2017.1293894
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14409917.2017.1293894
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectADORNO AND HORKHEIMER
dc.subjectENLIGHTENMENT
dc.subjectFOUCAULT
dc.subjectKANT
dc.subjectPOPULAR SOVEREIGNTY
dc.titleA Political Defence of Kant’s Aufklärung: An Essay
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución