dc.creatorVrojtech, Brlik
dc.creatorKolecek, Jaroslav
dc.creatorBurgess, Malcolm
dc.creatorHahn, Steffen
dc.creatorHumple, Diana
dc.creatorKrist, Milos
dc.creatorOuwehand, Janne
dc.creatorWeiser, Emily
dc.creatorAdamík, Peter
dc.creatorAlves, José
dc.creatorArlt, Debora
dc.creatorBarisic, Sanja
dc.creatorBecker, Detlef
dc.creatorBelda, Eduardo
dc.creatorBeran, Václav
dc.creatorBoth, Christiaan
dc.creatorBravo, Susana Patricia
dc.creatorBriedis, Martins
dc.creatorChutny, Bohumir
dc.creatorCikovic, Davor
dc.creatorCooper, Nathan
dc.creatorCosta, Joana
dc.creatorCueto, Víctor
dc.creatorEmmenegger, Tamara
dc.creatorFraser, Kevin
dc.creatorGilg, Olivier
dc.creatorGuerrero, Marina
dc.creatorHallworth, Michael
dc.creatorHewson, Chris
dc.creatorJiguet, Frédéric
dc.creatorJohnson, James
dc.creatorKelly, Tosha
dc.creatorKishkinev, Dmitry
dc.creatorLeconte, Michel
dc.creatorLislevand, Terje
dc.creatorLisovski, Simeon
dc.creatorLópez, Cosme
dc.creatorMcFarland, Kent
dc.creatorMarra, Peter
dc.creatorMatsuoka, Steven
dc.creatorMatyjasiak, Piotr
dc.creatorMeier, Christoph
dc.creatorMetzger, Benjamin
dc.creatorMonrós, Juan
dc.creatorNeumann, Roland
dc.creatorNewman, Amy
dc.creatorNorris, Ryan
dc.creatorPärt, Tomas
dc.creatorPavel, Václav
dc.creatorPerlut, Noah
dc.creatorPiha, Markus
dc.creatorReneerkens, Jeroen
dc.creatorRimmer, Christopher
dc.creatorRoberto Charron, Amélie
dc.creatorScandolara, Chiara
dc.creatorSokolova, Natalia
dc.creatorTakenaka, Makiko
dc.creatorTolkmitt, Dirk
dc.creatorvan Oosten, Herman
dc.creatorWellbrock, Arndt
dc.creatorWheeler, Hazel
dc.creatorvan der Winden, Jan
dc.creatorWitte, Klaudia
dc.creatorWoodworth, Bradley
dc.creatorProchazka, Petr
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-21T12:21:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T13:51:17Z
dc.date.available2020-04-21T12:21:12Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T13:51:17Z
dc.date.created2020-04-21T12:21:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.identifierVrojtech, Brlik; Kolecek, Jaroslav; Burgess, Malcolm; Hahn, Steffen; Humple, Diana; et al.; Weak effects of geolocators on small birds: A meta-analysis controlled for phylogeny and publication bias; British Ecological Society; Journal of Animal Ecology; 89; 1; 2-2019; 207-220
dc.identifier0021-8790
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/103112
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4393464
dc.description.abstractCurrently, the deployment of tracking devices is one of the most frequently used approaches to study movement ecology of birds. Recent miniaturization of light-level geolocators enabled studying small bird species whose migratory patterns were widely unknown. However, geolocators may reduce vital rates in tagged birds and may bias obtained movement data. There is a need for a thorough assessment of the potential tag effects on small birds, as previous meta-analyses did not evaluate unpublished data and impact of multiple life-history traits, focused mainly on large species and the number of published studies tagging small birds has increased substantially. We quantitatively reviewed 549 records extracted from 74 published and 48 unpublished studies on over 7,800 tagged and 17,800 control individuals to examine the effects of geolocator tagging on small bird species (body mass <100 g). We calculated the effect of tagging on apparent survival, condition, phenology and breeding performance and identified the most important predictors of the magnitude of effect sizes. Even though the effects were not statistically significant in phylogenetically controlled models, we found a weak negative impact of geolocators on apparent survival. The negative effect on apparent survival was stronger with increasing relative load of the device and with geolocators attached using elastic harnesses. Moreover, tagging effects were stronger in smaller species. In conclusion, we found a weak effect on apparent survival of tagged birds and managed to pinpoint key aspects and drivers of tagging effects. We provide recommendations for establishing matched control group for proper effect size assessment in future studies and outline various aspects of tagging that need further investigation. Finally, our results encourage further use of geolocators on small bird species but the ethical aspects and scientific benefits should always be considered.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBritish Ecological Society
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12962
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2656.12962
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCONDITION
dc.subjectMIGRATION
dc.subjectPHENOLOGY
dc.subjectREPRODUCTION
dc.subjectRETURN RATE
dc.subjectSURVIVAL
dc.subjectTAG EFFECT
dc.subjectTRACKING DEVICE
dc.titleWeak effects of geolocators on small birds: A meta-analysis controlled for phylogeny and publication bias
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución