dc.creatorPoisson, Mariano
dc.creatorBustos, C.
dc.creatorLopez Fuentes, Marcelo Claudio
dc.creatorMandrini, Cristina Hemilse
dc.creatorCristiani, Germán Diego
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-18T21:31:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T13:33:24Z
dc.date.available2020-02-18T21:31:48Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T13:33:24Z
dc.date.created2020-02-18T21:31:48Z
dc.date.issued2019-09
dc.identifierPoisson, Mariano; Bustos, C.; Lopez Fuentes, Marcelo Claudio; Mandrini, Cristina Hemilse; Cristiani, Germán Diego; Two successive partial mini-filament confined ejections; Elsevier; Advances in Space Research; 9-2019; 1-25
dc.identifier0273-1177
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/98001
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4391768
dc.description.abstractActive region (AR) NOAA 11476 produced a series of confined plasma ejections, mostly accompanied by flares of X-ray class M, from 08 to 10 May 2012. The structure and evolution of the confined ejections resemble that of EUV surges; however, their origin is associated to the destabilization and eruption of a mini-filament, which lay along the photospheric inversion line (PIL) of a large rotating bipole. Our analysis indicate that the bipole rotation and flux cancellation along the PIL have a main role in destabilizing the structure and triggering the ejections. The observed bipole emerged within the main following AR polarity. Previous studies have analyzed and discussed in detail two events of this series in which the mini-filament erupted as a whole, one at 12:23 UT on 09 May and the other at 04:18 UT on 10 May. In this article we present the observations of the confined eruption and M4.1 flare on 09 May 2012 at 21:01 UT (SOL2012-05-09T21:01:00) and the previous activity in which the mini-filament was involved. For the analysis we use data in multiple wavelengths (UV, EUV, X-rays, and magnetograms) from space instruments. In this particular case, the mini-filament is seen to erupt in two different sections. The northern section erupted accompanied by a C1.6 flare and the southern section did it in association with the M4.1 flare. The global structure and direction of both confined ejections and the location of a far flare kernel, to where the plasma is seen to flow, suggest that both ejections and flares follow a similar underlying mechanism.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117719306891
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.026
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectSOLAR ACTIVITY
dc.subjectSOLAR FLARES
dc.subjectSOLAR PHYSICS
dc.subjectSOLAR ULTRAVIOLET EMISSION
dc.subjectSOLAR X-RAY AND GAMMA-RAY EMISSION
dc.titleTwo successive partial mini-filament confined ejections
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución