dc.creatorMoguillansky, Martin Oscar
dc.creatorRotolo, Antonino
dc.creatorSimari, Guillermo Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-27T16:29:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T12:40:49Z
dc.date.available2019-11-27T16:29:56Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T12:40:49Z
dc.date.created2019-11-27T16:29:56Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-01
dc.identifierMoguillansky, Martin Oscar; Rotolo, Antonino; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; Hypotheses and their dynamics in legal argumentation; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Expert Systems with Applications; 129; 01-9-2019; 37-55
dc.identifier0957-4174
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/90653
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4387189
dc.description.abstractWe investigate some legal interpretation techniques from the viewpoint of the Argentinian jurisprudence. This allows the proposal of a logical framework –from a computer science perspective–for modeling such specific reasoning techniques towards an appropriate construction of legal arguments. Afterwards, we study the usage of assumptions towards construction of hypotheses. This is proposed in the dynamic context of legal procedures, where the referred argumentation framework evolves as part of the investiga- tion instance prior to the trial. We propose belief revision operators to handle such dynamics, preserving a coherent behavior with regards to the legal interpretation used. Abduction is finally proposed to con- struct systematic hypothesization, with the objective to bring semi-automatic recommendations to push forward the investigation of a legal case.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417419302210
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.047
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectLEGAL REASONING
dc.subjectARGUMENTATION
dc.subjectHYPOTHETICAL REASONING
dc.subjectFACT FINDING
dc.subjectARGUMENTATION THEORY
dc.subjectBELIEF REVISION
dc.titleHypotheses and their dynamics in legal argumentation
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución