dc.creatorEspósito, María Andrea
dc.creatorGatti, Ileana
dc.creatorCointry Peix, Enrique Luis
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-12T19:59:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T12:30:21Z
dc.date.available2019-12-12T19:59:53Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T12:30:21Z
dc.date.created2019-12-12T19:59:53Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.identifierEspósito, María Andrea; Gatti, Ileana; Cointry Peix, Enrique Luis; Construction and validation of core collections in Pisum sp. using different methodologies; Agricultural Research Communication Centre; Legume Research; 2019; 4-2019; 1-7
dc.identifier0250-5371
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/92128
dc.identifier0976-0571
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4386186
dc.description.abstractCore collections contribute to make conservation expenses more efficient and facilitate a better utilization of accessions in breeding programs. Eighty-five accessions from the working collection of Pisum germplasm belonging to cultivated species and subspecies were evaluated during 2015 and 2016 in the College of Agricultural Sciences, Rosario National University. Phenotypic values of 12 morphological traits were measured and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) of the adjusted means or genotypic values for these traits was calculated. Molecular characterization was performed assaying a total of 15 SSR primer combinations and 25 SRAP primer combinations on all accessions. With all the data collected, four Cluster Analysis were performed (phenotypic values, genotypic values, molecular markers and consensus) to divide the accessions into groups with similar characteristics. Four strategies to determine the number of accessions selected from each group (constant, logarithmic, proportional and maximization strategies) were applied to construct 16 core collections. Validation of the core collections were performed analyzing the parameters Mean difference percentage (MD), Variance difference percentage (VD), Coincidence rate of range (CR) Variable rate of coefficient of variation (VR), Shannon diversity index (SW) and the taxonomy coverage (TC). Considering all validation parameters together, the logarithmic strategy with genotypic values data was the best strategy, while the worst strategy was the proportional strategy with molecular marker data.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAgricultural Research Communication Centre
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.18805/LR-451
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://arccjournals.com/journal/legume-research-an-international-journal/LR-451
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectPISUM
dc.subjectMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION
dc.subjectMOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION
dc.subjectGENOTYPIC VALUES
dc.titleConstruction and validation of core collections in Pisum sp. using different methodologies
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución