dc.creatorWilcox, Sherman
dc.creatorMartínez, Rocío Anabel
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-19T17:18:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T11:47:00Z
dc.date.available2022-09-19T17:18:37Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T11:47:00Z
dc.date.created2022-09-19T17:18:37Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.identifierWilcox, Sherman; Martínez, Rocío Anabel; The conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Psychology; 11; 7-2020; 1-16
dc.identifier1664-1078
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/169342
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4382486
dc.description.abstractWe examine the conceptualization of space in signed language discourse within the theory of Cognitive Grammar. Adopting a Places view, we define Place as a symbolic structure that associates a schematic semantic pole and a schematic phonological pole. Places acquire full contextual meaning and a specific spatial location in the context of a usage event.In the present article, we analyze the referential function of Places in different grammatical constructions throughout a selection of videos produced by deaf Argentine Sign Language signers. Our analysis examines Places which are associated with entities in the surrounding spatial environment, as well as Places that are created or recruited in discourse without reference to surrounding physical entities. We observe that Places are used in pointing, placing, and other grammatical constructions in order to introduce and track referents in ongoing discourse. We also examine the use of conceptual reference points, by which Places afford mental access to new related concepts that are the intended focus of attention.These results allow us to discuss three related issues. First, for signed language discourse, space is both semantically and phonologically loaded. Signers? semantic and phonological choices for Place symbolic structures are motivated by embodied experience and the abstraction of usage events. Second, Places occur along a continuum from deixis to anaphor, united by the same conceptual system and differing in extent of phonological subjectification. Third, we suggest developmental implications of our Place analysis.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406/full?&utm_source=Email_to_authors_&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=T1_11.5e1_author&utm_campaign=Email_publication&field=&journalName=Frontiers_in_Psychology&id=535539
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectSIGNED LANGUAGE
dc.subjectCOGNITIVE GRAMMAR
dc.subjectPOINTING
dc.subjectREFERENCE POINTS
dc.subjectDEIXIS
dc.titleThe conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución