dc.creatorLerner, Gonzalo
dc.creatorAlbert, Scott
dc.creatorCaffaro, Pedro Alejandro
dc.creatorVillalta, Jorge Ignacio
dc.creatorJacobacci, Florencia
dc.creatorShadmehr, Reza
dc.creatorDella Maggiore, Valeria Monica
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-15T12:51:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T11:41:00Z
dc.date.available2021-09-15T12:51:50Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T11:41:00Z
dc.date.created2021-09-15T12:51:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifierLerner, Gonzalo; Albert, Scott; Caffaro, Pedro Alejandro; Villalta, Jorge Ignacio; Jacobacci, Florencia; et al.; The origins of anterograde interference in visuomotor adaptation; Oxford Univ Press Inc; Cerebral Cortex; 30; 7; 3-2020; 4000-4010
dc.identifier1047-3211
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/140374
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4381984
dc.description.abstractAnterograde interference refers to the negative impact of prior learning on the propensity for future learning. There is currently no consensus on whether this phenomenon is transient or long lasting, with studies pointing to an effect in the time scale of hours to days. These inconsistencies might be caused by the method employed to quantify performance, which often confounds changes in learning rate and retention. Here, we aimed to unveil the time course of anterograde interference by tracking its impact on visuomotor adaptation at different intervals throughout a 24-h period. Our empirical and model-based approaches allowed us to measure the capacity for new learning separately from the influence of a previous memory. In agreement with previous reports, we found that prior learning persistently impaired the initial level of performance upon revisiting the task. However, despite this strong initial bias, learning capacity was impaired only when conflicting information was learned up to 1 h apart, recovering thereafter with passage of time. These findings suggest that when adapting to conflicting perturbations, impairments in performance are driven by two distinct mechanisms: a long-lasting bias that acts as a prior and hinders initial performance and a short-lasting anterograde interference that originates from a reduction in error sensitivity.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherOxford Univ Press Inc
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/cercor/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cercor/bhaa016/5771324
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa016
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectANTEROGRADE INTERFERENCE
dc.subjectERROR SENSITIVITY
dc.subjectMOTOR LEARNING
dc.subjectSTATE-SPACE MODEL
dc.subjectVISUOMOTOR ADAPTATION
dc.titleThe origins of anterograde interference in visuomotor adaptation
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución