dc.contributorArbab, Arbab I.
dc.creatorLópez, Cristian Ariel
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-28T14:12:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T11:29:51Z
dc.date.available2020-12-28T14:12:58Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T11:29:51Z
dc.date.created2020-12-28T14:12:58Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierLópez, Cristian Ariel; Is quantum mechanics really timeless?; Nova Science Publishers; 2019; 140-155
dc.identifier978-1-53614-208-2
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/121191
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4381009
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I shall put into question a widely-held claim in the discussion on the arrow of time in quantum mechanics: since the Schrödinger equation is evidently time-reversal invariant, there is no room for a fundamental arrow of time in quantum mechanics. I shall first show that there are two ways to define a time-reversal operator in quantum mechanics. Next, I shall argue that the rationale to get rid of one of these time-reversal operator may be challenged.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherNova Science Publishers
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://novapublishers.com/shop/quantum-mechanics-theory-analysis-and-applications/
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceQuantum Mechanics: Theory, Analysis and Applications
dc.subjectQUANTUM MECHANICS
dc.subjectTIME
dc.subjectTIME SYMMETRY
dc.subjectREALITY OF TIME
dc.titleIs quantum mechanics really timeless?
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución