| dc.creator | Arena, Federico José | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-02T14:12:14Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-15T11:09:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-05-02T14:12:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-15T11:09:52Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2022-05-02T14:12:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-03 | |
| dc.identifier | Arena, Federico José; Embodied conventions. Some comments on their social dimension and intentionality; Klub Revus; Revus; 30; 3-2016; 59-67 | |
| dc.identifier | 1855-7112 | |
| dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/156219 | |
| dc.identifier | CONICET Digital | |
| dc.identifier | CONICET | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4379243 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In these brief comments on Bruno Celano's Pre-conventions. A Fragment of the Background, I propose further thoughts on what, following Celano's analysis, I call embodied conventions. I begin with a number of remarks on Celano's philosophical method. Then, I claim, first, that the social dimension of conventionality remains obscure in his account of embodied conventions. Second, that his account of pre-conventions (embodied conventions that are in the Background) is still imprecise due to the ambiguity of the notion of the Background. | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Klub Revus | |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.openedition.org/revus/3702 | |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.3702 | |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | PHILOSOPHICAL METHOD | |
| dc.subject | SOCIAL DIMENSION | |
| dc.subject | BACKGROUND | |
| dc.title | Embodied conventions. Some comments on their social dimension and intentionality | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
